Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Social / Political’ Category

I went by the Board of Elections and voted today, which is a privilege that I am still grateful for.  I have travelled the world enough to know that this is an opportunity that many people never get, and I am thankful to have lived in a country that affords me the chance to participate in the process.  I can’t say that I was excited by anything I saw on the ballot, or that I am heavily invested in the outcome.  It’s not that I don’t care, it’s just the understanding that pretty much nothing we’re hearing or seeing in this season is rooted in truth.  

In my lifetime, I have watched the pendulum swing back and forth between Republican and Democratic administrations, and though they claim to be apples and oranges on the campaign trail, they tend to grow the same bad fruit once they get in office.  I’ve lived too long to buy into the narrative that one of them is the good guys, and the other is the bad guys, or that any of them is losing sleep over my situation or the condition of my family.  I certainly don’t think either party is a reflection of my value system, so it’s always a challenge to find a candidate to believe in.  

The nature of democracy is that whatever the majority believes will set the tone for the future, and all I have to do is turn on the television, or the radio, or go to the movies, to know that my belief system has moved to the fringe of our culture.  Perhaps more importantly, I’ve come to realize that the quality of my life doesn’t really hinge on these people.  While their decisions will certainly impact me and my family, we will be far more affected by the people we live with everyday.  And so the thought of alienating family members, friends, neighbors, and co-workers over these issues seems a foolish path.  

In a couple of weeks, all of these races will be decided, and we will be faced with the consequences of our collective choices.  Many will immediately be disappointed with the outcome, while for others, it may take a year or two to realize that it was never what it pretended to be.  How we handle that disappointment, and how we relate to each other will make all the difference. 

Thankfully, I’ve learned not to invest my hope for the future in who is sitting in the White House, or walking the halls of Congress.  The day after this election is over, and regardless of how it turns out, I will go back to doing the best I can for my family, my neighbors, and my friends.  For me, this election cycle is over, and it’s time to move on. 

Read Full Post »

As the grandson of immigrants, I was raised with a deep reverence for the United States of America, and all the opportunities it has afforded our family.  Collectively, our patriotism has at times bordered on fanatical, with nearly unquestioned loyalty towards the high ideals we were taught.  As a young man, I served my country, just as my father did before me, knowing that it might cost me my life. It was a price I was more than willing to pay, and something that I do not regret.

For most of my life, I considered my allegiance to God and to my country as being essentially synonymous, but as I grew closer to the Lord, I found Him challenging that notion.  At first, it was in a broad sense, but in recent years it has become far more acute.  Though I remain grateful for this country, and the liberty it has provided, my perspective has been significantly altered as to the place it should hold in my heart.  I offer this essay for those who may find themselves on a similar journey.

Growing up, the words Jefferson penned in the Declaration of Independence were held in the highest esteem, “We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable; that all men are created equal & independent, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent & inalienable, among which are the preservation of life, & liberty, & the pursuit of happiness.”  It wasn’t until the Lord challenged me to read those words with spiritual eyes that I began to see an issue.  Much like Superman’s pledge to fight for truth, justice and the American way, I started to recognize that God is only committed to two out of the three.

Interestingly, Jefferson’s allusions toward pursuing “happiness” were derived from the writings of other founding fathers, like John Locke (e.g. “Essay Concerning Human Understanding”), and George Mason (e.g. Virginia Declaration of Rights).  Indeed, these words were far too reasonable to raise an eyebrow or an objection, and from a strictly human perspective they are completely rationale.  It is not until you look at them through the lens of scripture that you recognize there may be a problem.

In the truest sense, God has given us the unalienable right to pursue our own happiness.  By placing the forbidden tree within the garden, and not erecting an impenetrable wall around it, He made it our decision.  On the one hand we could dwell within the garden, completely dependent on Him for all things, or on the other hand, we could be “like God (Gen.3:5)”, and decide for ourselves what is good, and what is evil. It is ultimately the choice between being separated unto God (i.e. holiness), or being separated from God (i.e. sin).  One could even say that Adam and Eve’s decision was mankind’s original declaration of independence. 

John Kennedy said that, “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.”  J.I. Packer noted that a half-truth masquerading as the whole truth can often become a complete untruth. And Isa Blagden observed that, “If a lie is only printed often enough, it becomes a quasi-truth, and if such a truth is repeated often enough, it becomes an article of belief, a dogma, and men will die for it.”  I believe that all these ideas are relevant in understanding the arc of how “The Pursuit of Happiness” has largely become America’s spiritual undoing.

Another important distinctive is the difference between joy and happiness.  In my formative years, I would have considered joy to simply be the high end of the happiness scale.  Thus, if I liked something, it made me “happy”, but if it made me really, really happy, it qualified as “joyous”.  But, after coming to know the Lord in a more substantive way, I’ve come to realize that these words are actually describing two very different experiences. 

Happiness is largely just a positive feeling that one gets from external stimuli (e.g. smelling grandma’s famous pie baking, cuddling a puppy, winning the race…), and it tends to be both circumstantial and fleeting.  While the joy that God offers (i.e. “the joy of the Lord” – Nehemiah 8:10) comes from His Spirit (1Thes.1:6), and rises up from within our being.  It is both substantial and profound.  For those who have experienced the latter, there is really no comparison between the two.

I would submit that the stubborn belief that we know what will make us “happy” is a by-product of the forbidden fruit, which is ultimately rooted in the idea that we know what is “good” (i.e. good for us).  But just as Jesus told the rich young ruler (Luke 18:19), there is really only One who can define what is “good”.  Proverbs (14:12) says that there is a way that seems right to a man, but that it leads to death.  And Henry David Thoreau observed that most men “lead lives of quiet desperation,” which would seem to affirm the idea that we are not well-equipped to identify what might actually make us “happy”.

Jesus taught that those who try to gain their life will eventually lose it, and that it is only those who are willing to lay down their life (for Him) who ultimately discover it (Matt.16:25).  Scripture tells us that if we pursue Him and His purposes, He will work all things to our good (Rom.8:28) and that all we need will be added unto us (Matt.6:33).  And the Lord makes it clear that no servant can serve “two masters” (Matt.6:24).  Those who are called by His name must choose whether their pursuit will be of Him (Matt.22:37) or of their own “happiness”.

Western Christianity has largely replaced the concept of self-sacrifice (i.e. dying to self) with self-actualization (i.e. empowerment, fulfillment, blessing, calling, gifts…).  This revised version of the gospel allows one to live their best life here on earth, and then ascend to the heavenly mansion that has most certainly been set aside for them. 

But Jesus said that anyone who is not willing to take up their cross and follow Him (i.e. to lay down their lives and serve God’s purposes) is not worthy of Him (Matt.10:38).  In order to qualify as a “Follower” one must be willing to allow someone else to take the lead, and then base their responses on that leader’s cues, which precludes being guided by what has the greatest potential to lead to happiness. 

The popular rationale is that because God loves us, He surely wants us to be happy, and that happiness is just part of the blessing package Jesus died to give us.  Indeed, the scripture does speak of an inexpressible joy (1Peter 1:8), but as previously mentioned, this is a gift that comes from Him, and through His Spirit.  It is a by-product of a life surrendered to Him, and a heart that comes in concert with His.  If our pursuit is of happiness, God’s role is reduced to that of a power tool, that is simply used to get us what we really want.

Evidence of this mindset within “the church” can be found in the often discussed, and generally accepted idea of being angry with God, which at its core is a ridiculous notion.  In order to be angry with God, one must assume a position of superior knowledge, greater compassion or a more developed sense of justice than He.  But if the role we’ve assigned Him in our lives is that of a blessing dispenser, we will naturally feel cheated when He doesn’t deliver.  Like putting our quarters in the vending machine, we pound against the glass when the desired treat doesn’t fall as we anticipated.

I would submit that many “Christians” in America hold the words of documents like the Declaration of the Independence and the U.S. Constitution in similar regard to those of the scripture.  But despite their virtuous sounding language, they are not promoting the same message.  The pursuit of happiness keeps self at the center of our attention while scripture encourages us to esteem others above ourselves (Phil.2:3).  It keeps us focused on our circumstances, and how we feel about them, which is contrary to the numerous admonitions to focus on eternal things (2 Cor.4:18, Phil.4:8, Heb.12:2).   And most importantly, it replaces God as the object of our pursuit (Exod.20:3).

After years of believing that my love for God and country were wholly compatible, I can now hear the Lord declaring, “Choose this day whom you will serve!”  Shall we act upon what is seen and perishing, or shall we be moved by what is unseen and eternal (2Cor.4:18)?  Will our hearts allegiance be to our flag or to His cross?  Shall we seek His face (2 Chron.7:14) or simply look for His hand to work on our behalf?  Will our citizenship be invested in our beloved nation, or in the Kingdom of God (which is not of this world – John18:36)?  Shall we submit ourselves to the leadership that comes from above, or will we continue to clamor for an earthly king? 

Is America committed to blessing God to the same degree we are asking God to bless America?  Is our hope rooted in God’s goodness and sovereignty, or are we depending upon our “Godly heritage” and our democratic process?  Is the person of God the true object of our desire, or has He become a means to some other end (e.g. the American Dream)?

I am not advocating against loyalty and/or appreciation for our nation, or against participation within the democratic process, but we must recognize that these are temporal props within an eternal story.  They cannot compete for our allegiance to God and His sacred purposes. A house divided against itself cannot stand (Matt.12:25, Mark 3:25, Luke 11:17).

After a lifetime of assuming the inherent virtue of our way of life, I have been compelled to view my homeland through the lens of eternity.  While we like to think of ourselves as a bastion of freedom, the truth is far less flattering.  We are actually the most medicated, addicted, anxious, depressed, suicidal and incarcerated society on the planet. 

Our relative prosperity has not brought us joy, or peace, but it has resulted in a spiritual lethargy, and complacency in our relationship with God.  We, who are called by His name, are deeply divided, and distracted by all manner of disputable matters.  And despite all this, we remain convinced that God somehow wants to preserve things the way that they are.

Read Full Post »

Fear of COVID, or fear of what’s in the vaccine; fear of leaving your house, or fear of being quarantined to your house; fear of losing your government check, or fear of government control; fear of capitalism, or fear of socialism; fear of the left wing, or fear of the right wing, are all fueled by the same spirit. We cannot be driven by that spirit, and be led by the Holy Spirit.

Read Full Post »

I didn’t begin writing until I was almost 40 years old, which was about the time I began to discern the Lord’s voice more clearly.  As such, my motivation to continue has been centered on sharing what I believe He is saying at any particular time.  Within a few years I began to get regular downloads on subjects like relative truth, humanism, cultural revolution, and moral relativism.  Though I felt sure these insights were from the Lord, they seemed strange and rather worldly.  At the time, I didn’t see or hear anyone else talking about such things, and I wondered if I wasn’t just being pulled off track.  These topics seemed more rooted in sociology than spirituality, and generally garnered little or no response within my sphere.  Even so, the downloads continued to come.

Over time, I began to understand that God was giving me discernment of the emerging transformation.  To the naked eye, America didn’t look or sound much different, but beneath the surface there were monumental shifts taking place.  Our collective view of truth was being radically altered, and for the most part, we didn’t even notice.  Even those who did recognize the change didn’t necessarily understand the long term implications of it.  After all, humanism’s promotion of concepts like the intrinsic value of a human being, community, and social justice, seem to be very compatible with a standard Judeo-Christian value system. Indeed, many mainstream denominations appear to be predisposed to a sort of religious-humanist perspective, where tepid religious tradition is tolerated like a neutered dog, who sleeps in the breezeway, but never actually comes in the house.

With all the supernatural elements stripped away, God becomes more mythological than real (like Mother Nature); Jesus becomes little more than a revered historical figure (like Gandhi or Mother Theresa), and the Holy Spirit remains a ghost in the relentlessly pragmatic religious machine.  Effectively, such religion becomes two-dimensional and paper thin, but it is kept around to retain the sense and appearance of being good and moral.  The upside to such an arrangement is that it doesn’t interfere with a burgeoning friendship with the world.

With the benefit of almost two decades of hindsight, I can see that the repercussions of this shift have been far more profound than I first understood.  This change in course was not circumstantial or incidental, it was birthed in the spiritual realm, and the spirit behind the philosophical construct of humanism is not a passive or mild entity, it is an Anti-Christ spirit.  In its purist form, humanism is secular, with no allowance for anything supernatural, spiritual or transcendent.  It seeks to exalt man to the position of creator, ruler, and judge; which is as appealing to our human nature as it was to the first man (in the garden).  But these are all roles the Lord has reserved for Himself.

Compassionate, and well-meaning believers can easily be pulled into the idea that humanism’s emphasis on human rights might simply be viewed as an extension of God’s love and concern for people, but that is problematic.  Within this doctrine there can be no accommodation for the eternal, and no assent to a higher power.  It seeks to explain our origin as anything other than coming from a Creator, to promote the idea that we evolve as opposed to being transformed, and to replace the power of the Holy Spirit, with the power of the human spirit.  As John Lennon mused in his masterful ballad, “Imagine” we must rid ourselves of notions like heaven, hell and religion, so that we can all live together as one.  Indeed, humanism has so much faith in the virtue of mankind, that it presumes that left to its own devices, and separated from its ancient religious ideas, it will quite naturally arrive at a utopian society.  Of course, this is diametrically opposed to scripture’s assertions that apart from God, we can do “nothing”. 

While some might argue the Christian heritage of the United States, there is no doubt about where our society stands in this current age.  It is a culture steeped in humanist thinking, where the emerging generations are taught that evolution and technology have exempted them from the lessons of history, and where young children are taught that they can determine their own gender.  Like ancient Greece, we’ve become a nation filled with false gods, and altars to worship them at.

Perhaps no scripture makes the contradiction more plain than proverbs declaration that there is a way that seems right to a man, but it ultimately leads to death, while humanism purports that there is a way that seems right to a man, and it ultimately leads to paradise.

After a disheartening season of watching brothers and sisters on the right exalt a man as though he were a priest, a prophet or a king, and make it seem as though God desperately needed him (instead of the other way around), we now see brothers and sisters on the left being taken captive by a hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ.  Indeed, many who are called by His name are likely to perish from this lack of understanding, and many is the teacher leading His little ones astray. 

There is no man-made system that can produce or orchestrate real unity, true peace, authentic justice or genuine freedom.  If we continue to look to the world for such things, we will continue to be disappointed.  We need to quit fighting amongst ourselves, and begin to engage in the battle against the spirit of this age, which is devouring the world around us.

Read Full Post »

I grew up in a military family, normally living on Air Force bases with other military families. After high school, I joined the Navy, and for another decade lived/worked amongst people with differing backgrounds, diverse ethnicity, and varying belief systems.  The military made little allowance for our differences; once you donned the uniform you were expected to work together toward the greater mission.  I didn’t recognize it at the time, but this dramatically affected my understanding of community and family.  Even decades later, I still have many friends (and family) who don’t necessarily believe the things that I believe.  They grew up differently than I did, their life experience has led them to draw different conclusions than I have, and ultimately they view the world through a different lens than I do.  To me, this is not only how it’s always been, but also how it ought to be.  This doesn’t mean that we have nothing in common.  They love their families, value their communities, and hope to live in peace, just as I do.  I find my life is enriched, and my understanding is expanded, by remaining engaged with people who don’t necessarily think, act and live like I do.  Thus, I continue to seek the common ground that we all share.

 

When social media platforms like Facebook emerged, I found them to be a great way to stay connected, especially with friends and family who are literally spread all over the world. At its best, it has allowed us to remain connected in ways we couldn’t have otherwise.  No doubt, I want to celebrate their joys with them, and pray for them when they’re in a struggle, and to honor them when they’re gone.  But these days there seems to be a lot of pressure to use social media (and every other available platform) as a bully pulpit, where we exalt our preferences, ridicule those who have a differing point of view, and dare people to “Unfriend” us if they don’t like what we have to say.  People who refuse to participate in this battle of angry rhetoric are increasingly being criticized for not taking a side, accused of remaining “neutral” on the important issues of the day, and even being compared to those who stood by in Nazi Germany, doing nothing to stop the Holocaust.  As it goes with all the other points of view floating around cyberspace, they’re entitled to their opinion, and they’re also entitled to express it, but I don’t find their arguments compelling.

 

I believe that finding and cultivating the common ground that we share makes for stronger and more united communities. Building and strengthening these bonds of community is an essential first step in addressing the larger social issues we face.  Standing on opposite sides of the street, throwing rocks at each other isn’t going to achieve anything other than our eventual destruction.  I’m not sure what people think their vitriol achieves, but if posting an angry meme on social media is the extent of one’s activism, they’ve not done much.  Getting a bunch of folks, who already agreed with you, to “Like” your post doesn’t really effect change. If there is genuine oppression, it’s going to cost a lot more than some heated words to stand up to it.  If we are successful in alienating everyone who doesn’t look, think, and act like we do, we’ll have simply set the stage for civil war.  If we want to better understand the issues, we need to engage in meaningful dialogue with people of diverse viewpoints.  If we want to battle racism, we need to engage in meaningful relationships with people of other races.  If we want to battle poverty, we need to engage in the process of creating opportunities or providing aid to the underprivileged…  If we were that committed to change, we’d probably be too busy to spend so much time on Facebook.

Read Full Post »

One of the more positive effects of the technology revolution has been the flexibility it affords us in handling information; but this free flow of data hasn’t been without it’s perils. Accessible from so many different sources, stored in countless locations, and available in such diverse formats, we’re seeing that information is highly susceptible to corruption and manipulation.  Indeed, the emerging generation has grown up in an era where those who don’t like the history of something, can easily edit it, or simply delete the file altogether.  You see this tendency in personal interactions, where “Friends” are unfriended, conversation chains are deleted, and any photographic evidence is scrubbed from the memory card.  On a larger scale, there is a growing trend toward expunging the names and memories of those historical figures that don’t measure up to current sensibilities in regard to what is acceptable.

 

To be sure, I can understand the desire to avoid the uglier aspects of our history, both personally, and as a culture. Yet, I’m concerned that the unwitting consequence of so effectively erasing these unpleasant chapters is the likelihood that we will fail to learn the lessons taught by them, thus dooming us to repeat them some time in the future.

Read Full Post »

The proverbial “We” or “Us” (i.e. people who share our values/worldview) have a tendency to put our hate in a different category than the hate spread by the proverbial “Them” (i.e. people who don’t share our values/worldview). We see “Them” as haters, and view their hate as toxic. While we consider our brand of hate as being justified, and maybe even virtuous. Whether it is a hatred of Donald Trump, or Nancy Pelosi, of religion, or godlessness, of Socialism, or Capitalism, of Conservatives or Liberals or any one of the million other things we choose to hate, it all mixes together to create the same poisonous atmosphere. Martin Luther King Jr. observed that, “Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that”. We won’t get better as a society by continuing to berate, mock, taunt, protest, boycott, slander, threaten and attack each other. As Dr. King rightly concluded, “We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools.”   

 

Read Full Post »

A popularly held idea is that protests draw attention to an issue and create dialogue; but I’ve noticed that depending on the nature of the protest, it more often distracts us from the real issue and creates rhetoric. Dialogue is talking to each other, presumably with the intent of reaching some new level of agreement, while rhetoric is talking at each other, generally used to establish the superiority of our position.  One has the potential to move us forward together, while the other can become the basis for civil war.

Read Full Post »

It is not wrong that institutions aspire to build a track record of effectiveness, thereby gaining a reputation for success.  But when protecting the brand becomes more important than protecting the people who inhabit the group, damage is inevitable.  It begins subtly, as a disparity develops between the picture presented in front of the stakeholders, and the reality of what goes on behind the scenes.  The longer that gap is allowed to exist and grow, the greater the depths to which an entity is bound to fall.  While we may rationalize that the prosperity of the brand benefits everyone, an organization’s legacy is ultimately rooted in how they treat their people.

Read Full Post »

Our human nature tends to be drawn to the idea of being in control, while it is generally repulsed by the concept of being held accountable. Yet the inevitable consequence of gaining control is making ourselves accountable.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »