Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Social / Political’ Category

Dear Leadership of the Republican Party

I guess I should start by clarifying that I am not a member of your organization, though I have at times voted for your candidates. In my almost thirty years of voting I have never found enough common ground with either of the major political parties to affiliate with them; and at this point, it seems doubtful that will ever change. While I generally try to steer clear of the bipartisan brawl, my growing concern for the future of this country compels me to offer you a little advice for the 2012 Presidential election. Obviously, you can take it or leave it.

First and foremost, is that I hope the current rhetoric being spewed by many of the GOP presidential hopefuls is just the intro to something more substantive. Simply pointing out how bad things are isn’t much of a platform to run on. Don’t count on getting the free pass that the buzzword “change” got in the last election. I suspect that “We the People” will be looking for a definition this time.

Along those same lines, remember that we are a distinctly western culture and that aesthetics matter more than they should. Offering up a candidate who is nearly seventy years old, and whose political heyday was three administrations ago, would be a serious mistake. Barrack Obama was able to sell the idea that he’d be something different based largely on the fact that he looked and sounded different than the alternatives. Mr. McCain’s campaign was floundering until Sarah Palin entered the picture and her appeal was also rooted in the fact that she didn’t look and sound like everyone else. Those same aesthetics will matter in 2012.

Since I mentioned Sarah Palin, I ought to add that I believe that her political shelf life has expired. If she had remained the governor of Alaska and had led them as boldly as she presents herself, she might be considered some sort of credible alternative. Unfortunately, she quit that job, hit the talk-show circuit and her life has become tabloid fodder. At this point, she seems like a caricature; who has way too much in common with the Kardashian’s to be taken seriously.

Despite what the special interest groups will tell you, the number one issue on the minds of most American’s is the economy, and more specifically, jobs. If you don’t have some new ideas about how to turn things around, I’d get working on that now. Please don’t try to perpetuate the myth of the “Consumer Based Economy”. Low interest rates, more affordable lines of credit and tax breaks aren’t going to bring our economy back; we are not going to borrow, spend and consume our way back to prosperity. Our country has got to find a way to restore the balance between what we produce and what we consume. Trying to defy the law of supply and demand is the economic equivalent of trying to defy gravity.

Speaking of balance, I appreciate the idea that some of your guys have been trying to promote about government spending; it is absolutely out of control. Unfortunately, hammering the budget for things like Medicare and Medicaid, while discretionary spending remains largely unchecked, isn’t going to gain you much support with the American people. If you’re serious, you and your brothers across the aisle need to start axing all the activities that the government has no business being involved in. Using that criterion, you could probably cut the budget in half.

Finally, as a man who takes his morality pretty seriously, I like the idea of the “Moral Majority”. Unfortunately, I haven’t seen much evidence that such a group really exists. But as I’ve watched the last few election cycles, I have become convinced that there is a group of people who could rightfully be called the “Moderate Majority”. I believe that it is this group who represents the swing vote and that these are the people you need to reach. While staunch conservatives may feel that you’ve done a poor job of representing them, it seems doubtful that they’d be willing to re-elect Barrack Obama to another term. Though the extreme elements of both parties will attempt to hijack the primary process, the actual election will most likely be decided by this large group in the middle.

Well, that’s really all I had to say; hopefully something within this will be helpful to you. Good luck with all that, because there are an awful lot of lives and livelihoods that hang in the balance. See you at the polls.

Sincerely – Bryan J. Corbin (Ohio)

Read Full Post »

As a journalist, I spend a lot of time on my computer at home and generally my kids know not to interrupt me when I’m working; so it was a little surprising when my oldest son (Tim) came in recently to talk about something that was troubling him. As an extremely precocious eleven year old, with a naturally inquisitive mind, his concerns are rarely what you’d expect from a kid his age and such was the case in this instance. He explained that his teacher had taught them that the United States was not a “Christian Nation” and that it never really had been. This bothered Tim because we’d taught him that Christianity was an essential part of our national heritage. I tried to give him a quick answer about how it all depends on how you define the term “Christian Nation”, but that clearly didn’t resolve anything for him; so I decided to set aside my latest article and spend some time with him on this issue. Our conversation went something like this:

“If your teacher was simply saying that not every one of our forefathers was a Christian or that Christianity was never the official religion of America, then I agree with her. But if she was saying that Christianity, the Bible and God weren’t an essential part of what made this country what it was, then I’d disagree with her” I explained.

“But how could I prove that?” he asked.

After thinking about it for a minute, I replied, “As a reporter, I’ve found that the best way to get the real story is to go to the people who were there. If we could get an eyewitness account, we could probably arrive at the truth of the matter.”

Tim rolled his eyes in frustration, saying, “It’s going to be a little hard to get an interview with guys who’ve been dead for a couple hundred years.”

“It might be easier than you think,” I answered with a smile. I quickly keyed in an internet search of famous quotes from that time period and added, “We can chat with them on-line. You ask me your questions and I’ll try to get you a good answer from one of our forefathers”.

Though he looked skeptical, Tim eventually asked, “My teacher says that the early Americans left Europe to get away from religion, is that true?”

After scrolling through a few quotes, I said “Oh look, John Adams, the second president of the United States said, ‘We have no government armed with the power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion’; and Daniel Webster, another one of early America’s most influential leaders said, ‘Let us not forget the religious character of our origin’. And check this out; during the framing of the constitution, Benjamin Franklin quoted the Bible, saying, ‘Lest the Lord build the house, they labor in vain’ and when they were finished, James Madison added, ‘Without the intervention of God there never would have been a constitution’. These hardly sound like the words of people trying to get away from religion.”

Tim nodded in agreement, but then added, “My teacher admitted that many of the early American’s were from the Christian tradition, but she also said that they were careful not to include the teaching of the Bible into our laws. She said that they made sure that there would always be a separation of ‘Church and State’; is that true?”

Again I scrolled for a few seconds and replied, “John Quincy Adams, who was the son of John Adams and who became our sixth president said, ‘The highest glory of the American Revolution was this; it connected in one dissoluble bond the principles of civil government, with the principles of Christianity. From the day of the Declaration, they were bound by the laws of God, which they all and by the laws of the Gospel, which they nearly all, acknowledge as the rules of their conduct’; and James Madison said, ‘We stake the future of this country on our ability to govern ourselves under the principles of the Ten Commandments’. Not so many years later, President Andrew Jackson added, ‘The Bible is the rock upon which our Republic rests’.”

Tim smiled slyly, saying, “It sounds like she was wrong about that too! She said that America’s success as a nation has nothing to do with morality, that it’s really just because democracy is such a good system of government. What would the forefathers say about that?”

I smiled at his enthusiasm and said, “Well, I’m sure they’d agree that democracy is a good form of government, but John Hancock said, ‘all confidence must be withheld from the means we use; and reposed only on that God Who rules in the armies of Heaven, and without Whose blessing the best human counsels are but foolishness-and all created power vanity.’ Daniel Webster said that, ‘If we abide by the principles taught in the Bible, our country will go on prospering; but if we and our posterity neglect its instructions and authority, no man can tell how sudden a catastrophe may overwhelm us and bury all our glory in profound obscurity!’ And in the 1800’s, a man from France, named Alexis de Tocqueville came to America to study what made democracy work and he said that, ‘Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits aflame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power’. He went on to conclude that, ‘America is great because America is good’.”

Tim smiled triumphantly and declared, “So my teacher was wrong, America is a ‘Christian Nation’!”

As much as I wanted him to believe that, I had to be honest and say, “Not necessarily son”.

A wave of confusion washed across his face, as I went on to explain, “Just because it was a part of our heritage doesn’t mean that it is who we are today. Mr. De Tocqueville said that if America ever ceased being good, it would also cease to be great; and when a historian asked the famous American poet and diplomat, James Russell Lowell, how long the American republic would endure, he replied, ‘As long as the ideas of the men who founded it continue to dominate’. Just like God’s people in the Bible, we can lose our freedom if we decide to live by our own ideas.”

Tim was clearly troubled by this and with his face slightly twisted, he asked, “How do we convince everyone to follow God?”

“The good news is that we don’t have to; God told the Israelites that, ‘If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land” I replied.

“So if we follow God with all our hearts and pray, God will bless our country?” he asked.

“That’s the way I understand it” I replied. The smile returned to Tim’s face as he said, “Cool, I’m going to make sure I pray for that every day.”

“Good man” I replied; and as Tim headed out the door, he spun around and added, “I think I better pray for my teacher too.” I smiled back at him and said, “That’s my boy!”

Read Full Post »

Just as it is ridiculous to think that you could bring a community together by standing on opposite sides of the street, hurling stones at one another, so it is for elected officials, who claim to want to bring the country together, while employing this same strategy from opposite sides of the aisle.

Read Full Post »

I was born in 1963; about a month after John F. Kennedy was assassinated.  I vaguely remember Charles Manson, Woodstock and the Vietnam War; but I was really more a product of the Cold War era.  Back then, kids were raised with the notion that if we didn’t all perish in the midst of a nuclear holocaust, or succumb to the “killer bees” that were steadily migrating from the south, we’d inevitably be consumed by the coming of a second ice age.  This might explain some of the skepticism that people of my generation have about this whole global warming thing. 

It was a strange period in history, but as American’s we had the distinct advantage of having that “one thing” we all agreed on, which was that the Soviets were the “bad guys”.  By default, that meant we were the “good guys”.  That may not seem like much, but in hindsight, it was a lot more valuable than we understood.  The Cold War was largely fought in the fertile imaginations of the people and so it was quite a relief when we finally saw the Berlin Wall come down.  Since the Soviet Union soon broke into little pieces, it seemed obvious, even to the most casual observer, that America must be the winner.  This was sweet vindication for democracy, the US Olympic team and for our space program; all of which had bore questionable results in the past.  Presuming that the whole episode was a titanic struggle between the world’s two “super powers”, one had to conclude that we (i.e. the USA) were now the world’s preeminent “super power”.  After a mere two hundred years of history, all our hard work and struggle had paid off; and now we could rightfully claim to be the most powerful country in the world.  Certainly we had biggest middle class, the highest standard of living and the most fearsome military-industrial complex.  We even had a president that most American’s believed in, which turned out to be another thing that would soon become a distant memory.  That’s the ironic thing about making it to the pinnacle; the best you can hope for is that you stay there for a while.  Arguably, we did.

Just as adversity has a way of bringing people together, prosperity has a way of dividing them.  This problem is compounded when that prosperity is inherited instead of earned, because then it is viewed as a birth right instead of the byproduct of blood sweat and tears.  Indeed, the people of my generation were the benefactors of the generations who came before us and who were willing to pay a price, that we now seem unwilling to pay.  They believed that the good of the whole outweighed the needs of a few, while my generation ascribes to the belief that every person has a God given right to pursue happiness on their own terms.  We were raised with the idea that every generation ought to prosper even more than the last, but we failed to recognize that this principle only works when we are willing to put forth the same kind of effort and sacrifice that our predecessors did.  Indeed, democracy and free market economies only work when there’s a consistent level of effort and reinvestment in them; but we’ve become a generation of consumers.  As if that weren’t bad enough, we somehow managed to convince ourselves that we could somehow circumvent the principle of “supply and demand” simply by voraciously consuming the world’s goods.  Though we were able to pull that illusion off for a while, the economic equivalent of the law of gravity has finally caught up with us.  While we may have admired our grandparent’s gardens and while they may have left our cellars stocked with canned goods, the cupboards are now getting barren and we’ve never bothered to learn how to work the land for ourselves.

In moments of crisis, there is always a temptation to blame someone else for our condition, but to do so is rarely productive.  Though external forces are certainly a factor, we are generally hard pressed to change much outside of ourselves.  The cost of successfully finding someone to blame is that we become powerless to alter our course.  Sadly, my generation has made “The Blame Game” America’s favorite pastime.  We’re not fat because we have no self discipline, it’s because our parents damaged our self esteem or because McDonalds doesn’t have the right nutritional standards; we’re not in debt because we spent all sorts of money that we didn’t have, it’s because interest rates are too high or employers don’t pay enough; our marriages aren’t failing because we haven’t invested ourselves in them, it’s because our partner just isn’t meeting our needs; our kids don’t struggle in school because of our lack of genuine parenting, it’s because the teachers just don’t know how to motivate them; it’s the governments fault; it’s those right wing fanatic’s fault; it’s those bleeding heart liberals; it’s the radical Muslims, it’s Christianity; it’s everybody and everything, but me.  It is the proverbial “them”; and sadly, that has become the American way.

Our forefathers were raised under an oppressive regime and because of that, the government they formed was constructed to ensure that its leaders never attained that kind of control over the people.  They envisioned a government that would be a support to the people, but wouldn’t impede their opportunity to prosper.  They never intended for the government to be the source of that prosperity.  But in today’s world, as America’s collective prosperity seems to be teetering precariously, the people of my generation seem to be looking toward the government for the fix.  We expect them to make sure that we have a high paying job; that we always get to negotiate our price; that we all have good medical insurance; that the price of gas doesn’t get too high and that our borders are safe from terrorists, without causing us a corresponding delay at the airport.  Not only do we want that and more, we don’t want it to cost any more than the relatively sparse governmental model that our founders envisioned.  We keep electing people who promise those things, even though there is no possibility that they can deliver them.  Because my generation has never really experienced genuine governmental oppression, we clamor for them to take care of us; failing to realize that a government that is able to take care of the people, will ultimately control them.  We need only watch the rioting all over the Middle East to see what that looks like.  

On the rare occasion that the government does produce something to help the people, there never seems to be a shortage of individuals who stand at the ready to exploit it.  Like “The Blame Game”, exploiting “the system” for our personal gain is just part of the way that my generation does things.  When the Capitalists gave corporations incentives and tax breaks, in an effort to create a prosperity that would “trickle down” through the economy, corporate America exploited it into record profits; thereby blunting the intended effect.  When Socialists created programs to help those in need, many in our society made an industry out of exploiting those systems as well.  Regardless of what program our current administration may initiate, we can be sure there will be a group of American citizens who feel perfectly justified in exploiting it.  While the statue of “Lady Liberty” in New York’s harbor may be a symbol of the virtuous intent of our forefathers, I fear that if we had to recast her today, she would rightfully be in rags; ravaged and robbed by the very people who claimed to love her.    

Ultimately, I believe that the greatest crisis that we face in America today is not our collapsing economy, or the sky-rocketing national debt or even the threat of terrorism; it is the crisis of our national character.  Unless that changes, we will likely lack the unity and resilience needed to deal with any other issue.  It’s not them, it’s us, it’s our generation, it’s me!

Read Full Post »

I am a man of unclean lips

And I come from a people of unclean lips

Indeed, we are a people:

Who value political correctness above honesty

Form above substance

and

Comfort above resilience

*

Who esteem ideas over truth

Charisma over character

and

Instant gratification over an honest days work

*

Who prefer victory to integrity

Tolerance to moral standards

and

Stimulation to fidelity

*

Who have traded diligence for convenience

Foundations for facades

and

Self-sacrifice for self-indulgence

*

At this late date in our history

‘We the People’

Hold no truth to be self evident

And though it would be premature to say that

this nation has completely turned from the idea of ‘god’

We would certainly be hard pressed to agree on

his, her or its

name

Read Full Post »

Last Wednesday morning (11/03/2010), as the results of the mid-term elections were announced on the car radio, I noticed that my 10 year old son was watching for my reaction.  Apparently my lack of response stirred his curiosity and we had a conversation that went something like this:

“Dad, are we Republicans or Democrats?” he asked.

“Neither,” I replied.

“Don’t you have to be one or the other?” he continued.

“No, you don’t have to be a member of a political party if you don’t want to be,” I said.

“Don’t you like any of them?” he said.

“I don’t like any of them enough to join them or to vote for their candidate’s every time.  None of them really represent what I believe in, so it’s better for me to look at every candidate and to decide which is the one I want to vote for,” I explained.

“What’s the difference between the Republicans and the Democrats?” he asked.

I had to smile at that question, as I answered, “It’s not always clear son.  Generally, Republicans feel like less government means more freedom, so they tend to want to limit how involved the government gets in the lives of the people; while Democrats tend to be more concerned about social issues and feel as though the government has a duty to get involved in the lives of the people.  As you can imagine, these differing ideas cause them to disagree a lot.”

“Which idea do you think is right?” he asked.

“Actually, I see value in both ideas.  Like the Republicans, I generally feel that less government is better; but like the Democrats, I feel like the government should provide some help for people who really need it.  It’s just a question of balancing those two ideas.  If we make the government too small, there may be people who won’t get the help that they genuinely need; and if we make it too big, it could start to interfere with our freedom and become difficult to pay for,” I replied. 

With a puzzled look on his face, he asked, “Doesn’t the government just print up the money it needs?”

I chuckled, as I said, “Well they do print the money, but the truth is that the people pay the bills for the government; if we want them to do more, than we have to be willing to pay more for it.  If you hear a candidate promise to do more, without the cost going up, you’ll know that they’re not being honest about it.”

“So since the Republicans won last night, do you think the government is going to get smaller now?” he continued.

“Unfortunately, that’s probably not how it’s going to work; because neither side is willing to work with the other.  It’s like when the kids in the neighborhood get together for a football game; both sides want to win so badly that the minute one team starts to get ahead, the other one takes their ball and goes home.  For that last couple of years the Democrats had enough people in office that they didn’t even need the Republicans to play; but now that it’s closer to even, I expect that they’ll spend a lot of time fighting with each other and trying to convince the people that the other side is the reason for their lack of progress.  The truth is that their lack of progress is really caused by their unwillingness to work together to address the problems.”

“All the guys on TV said that they were going to make jobs for everyone; won’t that make things better?” he asked.

“It would help, if they actually had the ability to keep that promise.  The problem is that they can’t.  The government doesn’t make jobs, business and industry do that.  Though they can spend some of the people’s money to give a few people some temporary jobs, they can’t create the kind of job it takes to raise a family on,” I said grimly.

“Why do they promise things that they know they can’t deliver?” he asked angrily.

“Sadly, because they know that people are really hurting for jobs and that it’s what they want to hear,” I replied.

“But haven’t the people figured out that they’re lying?” he said.

“I guess not; it seems like a lot of people are still expecting someone in the government to deliver the jobs they promised.  You see, the government was meant to serve the people in certain limited ways, but it was never meant to take care of the people.  Now that things are getting hard, a lot of people seem to want the government to take care of them and it wasn’t built to do that.  It would be like me hiring a maid and paying her to serve me.  The more I pay her, the more she’s willing to do.  But if I lost my job and I can’t pay her anymore, should I expect that she’s now going to take care of me for free until things get better?” I said.

Shaking his head, he said, “No way, if you don’t have any money, she probably won’t do anything for you.”

“That’s right, she’s my servant, not my mother; but there are a lot of people in America who seem to think that our servant (i.e. the government) ought to take care of them like a mother.  At this point, “We the People” can either decide to rise to our new challenges, like we have many times before in our history or we can keep crying out for more government help, which will eventually result in a government that we serve.  The reason America has done so well, for so long, is because its people have been willing to rise to new challenges and we’re once again in one of those times.  It’s up to the people, not the government, to do things differently,” I replied.

“So is this why you don’t seem very excited about this election?” he asked.

I smiled, as I replied, “That’s right son, my hope isn’t that the government is going to save me or our family.  If it was, I’d be miserable.  Our hope needs to be invested in better promises than the ones you’ve heard on TV.”

“So, should I even bother to vote when I get older?” he asked.

“Absolutely, you have been blessed to grow up in a country where the people have a voice in their government and as a citizen; you have a responsibility to participate in that process.  I don’t want you to think that it doesn’t matter, because even if the government is just a servant, it affects your life and the lives of people you care about.  You definitely need to take your rights as a citizen seriously, but don’t lose sight of the fact that the government can’t deliver peace and prosperity to your life.  Those things will depend on the choices that you make.”

At that moment, we drove up in front of the school and the conversation ended.

Read Full Post »

To say that people should not raise issues unless they have solutions is akin to saying that people should not yell “Fire” in a burning theatre unless they have a way to extinguish the flames.

Read Full Post »

As is often the case when I tune into the news, I was sickened by the report of the senseless death of Tyler Clementi; a freshman at New Jersey’s Rutgers University.  According to sources, Tyler jumped to his death, after a video of his intimate encounter with another man, which had been secretly recorded by his room-mate, was posted on the internet.

*

While the despicable act of the room-mate has been universally condemned, much of the reaction to this tragedy seems to be focused on the homosexual aspect of the story.  And while I do understand why homosexual activists would want to use this as an example, I believe that the implications of this act extend beyond the issue of sexuality.  From my perspective, it points to a fundamental lack of respect for the privacy and dignity of all human beings.

*

Though nothing excuses this heinous invasion, it seems to be in keeping with the increasingly voyeuristic nature our society.  Advances in technology and the popularity of outlets like MySpace, Facebook, Twitter and You-Tube, have given us unprecedented access into even the most private aspects of each others lives; and by all indications, we as a society can’t get enough of it.  The entertainment industry continues to feed this frenzy with increasingly raw reality shows and artful explorations of the most twisted components of the human psyche.  At some level, the general public seems to feel as though it is entitled to this unfettered access.  For example, it’s not good enough that Tiger Woods would admit to cheating on his wife, we want to know the details and if someone has video, we want that too.  But if we as a society demand that kind of access, aren’t we implicitly commissioning acts like that of the room-mate in this case.  At 18 years of age, this young man has grown up in a time when little, if anything, has been off limits; and so what should we as a society have expected to stop him in this case?  Someone of my generation may answer, “Common decency”, but is there a commonly held standard for decency anymore.  Not surprisingly, lawyers for this young man simply describe him as “confused”.

*

While many will point to this story as an example of why we need to be more “tolerant” of homosexuals; I think we’d be better to use it as an example of why we need to “respect” the dignity and privacy of all of our fellow human beings, regardless of their sexuality.  As near as I can tell, Tyler was a fine young man and my heart breaks at the thought that he is gone.

Read Full Post »

Bullying

It’s probable that most of us have encountered a “bully” at one time or another in our childhood.  Certainly, it’s an inherent part of the human psyche and elemental within the balance of nature, that the strong endeavor to dominant the weak.  And though the issue of bullying has always been with us, educators are warning that amongst this current generation of young people, it is taking on new and epic proportions.  As the father of four school aged children, I can absolutely attest to the pervasiveness of this problem.  Despite the fact that school systems are spending a significant amount of time and energy addressing the topic; it’s unclear whether these efforts are bearing much fruit.  In light of this, it would seem worthwhile to examine some of the factors driving this trend.

In the last half of the twentieth century and the first decade of this new millennium, we have witnessed a sweeping philosophical change across America; as the “God and Country” thinking of the war years has given way to the individualistic, “Post-Modern” philosophy of today.  Despite the profound nature of this change, many seem incredibly unaware of its implications.  Perhaps the most dramatic element within this shift has been the way in which “truth” is defined.  Whereas truth was once viewed as being absolute (i.e. defined and unchanging), the Post Modern thinker sees truth as relative (i.e. pliable, changing and subject to personal experience).  Indeed, surveys suggest that as many as three quarters of the adults in America now adhere to this concept and our young people are growing up in a culture that endeavors to weave this ideology into every facet of their upbringing.  For them, the concept of good and evil has largely become an abstract; not defined by some external moral code, but driven by some internal impulse which decides whether it “feels right” to them.  Their heroes are rarely a part of the established authoritarian structure (e.g. Avatar, The X-Men, The Dark Knight, Jack Sparrow, Iron-man, Indiana Jones, Spiderman…) and tend to be defined more by their penchant for winning battles than by their particular motivation for the fight.  Within the parameters of this philosophy, any entity which attempts to define and/or enforce a boundary/limitation is generally viewed as intolerant and oppressive, which can make things especially difficult on parents, teachers, coaches, supervisors…   

In this new era of American history, the needs of the few have come to outweigh the needs of the many, as the secular humanist doctrine exalts the individual above all else.  And as we embrace this ideology fully, our kid’s concept of reality is being shaped by it.  In absence of some definitive moral standard, “good” becomes whatever seems favorable to me at a particular time; in the absence of absolute truth, “right” is whatever I define it as in that moment; and as my individual needs become the focal point, the desired ends justify the means necessary to obtain them.  Our children are bombarded with images of shameless manipulation and intrigue from the entertainment (e.g. shows like Survivor, The Apprentice, The Bachelor, The Bachelorette) and sports (e.g. athletes who are above the law, who refuse to fulfill their contractual obligations, who destroy their families with their infidelities…) worlds; which often promote these things as part of the pathway to success.  There are even kids who’ve been taught firsthand by parents and coaches that intimidation and trash talking are essential tools for anyone who hopes to be a “winner”.  Given all of these external factors and our natural inclination to dominate, is it any wonder that bullying has become rampant.

Maybe even more troubling than recognizing the problem is finding a solution.  After all, we can tell our kids that it’s wrong to bully, but our philosophy has already undermined the concept of right and wrong.  We can tell them that they’ll reap what they sow or that they should live by the “Golden Rule”, but those ideas come from an ancient book known as the Bible, which we are systematically eradicating from the fabric of our society.  We can tell them that “cheaters never prosper”, but all they have to do is turn on the television to see that they often do (at least for awhile).  Ultimately, when every man is allowed to adhere to his own version of the truth, there is no law that couldn’t be struck down based on the fact that it inhibits his right to choose; which would eventually result in a state of lawlessness and chaos.  That would seem to be the natural outcome of a philosophy that abandons absolutes and if so, maybe what educators are experiencing in our schools today is simply a preview of things to come for our society as a whole.

Read Full Post »

“Most often the price of ‘having it all’, is everything that really matters.”

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »