Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Heart of “The Father”’ Category

Slowly, but deliberately, we’ve made our way to the water. At times it has seemed like a celebration, as we revisited the joys of our collective history. But at other times, it has grown ominously quiet, as the reality of our impending farewell settles in.

Reaching the pier, the sound of the ship’s bell reminds us of the scarcity of time, and something that feels like panic briefly washes over me. There is a very human tendency to want to avoid such moments, and perhaps an even stronger urge to fixate on them. I know that I am not ready to say goodbye, but as I look into your eyes, it’s clear that it’s time for you to go.

I can see that you are shivering, and that these blankets have lost their ability to make you warm. And as much as I dred letting you go, I would not wish for you to spend another night in the cold. I can tell that you are worried for us, because that is how you’ve always been, but like our own apprehensions, it’s something we must set aside. We’ve arrived at the moment, and regardless of whether we feel ready, it is here.

So even though I cannot fathom a future without you, my heart cries,

Run to the light dear brother

Journey to that distant shore

Don’t look back in anguish

Be at peace

Know that the Father who awaits your arrival will care for us

Know that you will always occupy this place in our hearts

One day we will all be together again

Run to the light dear brother

Run to the light

And be free!

Read Full Post »

(Another writing from the archives)

This article reminded me of something the Lord showed me several years ago, which I added below.

“Picked up for 3 bucks, Chinese bowl goes for $2.2 million at auction”

   By Erin McClam, Staff Writer, NBC News

A Chinese bowl that a New York family picked up for $3 at a garage sale turned out to be a 1,000-year-old treasure and has sold at auction for $2.2 million.

The bowl — ceramic, 5 inches in diameter and with a saw-tooth pattern etched around the outside — went to a London dealer, Giuseppe Eskenazi, at Sotheby’s auction house in New York on Tuesday.

Sotheby’s said the bowl was from the Northern Song Dynasty, which ruled China from 960 to 1127 and is known for its cultural and artistic advances.

The auction house said the only other known bowl of similar size and design has been in the collection of the British Museum for more than 60 years. The house had estimated that this one would sell for $200,000 to $300,000.

Sotheby’s did not identify the sellers, but said they put the bowl up for auction after consulting with experts. The family bought the bowl in 2007 and had kept it on a mantel in the years since. There weren’t any additional details made public about the garage sale where they had purchased the item.

Years ago, the Lord showed me a picture of an oil painting, sitting on an old, chrome framed, yellow vinyl, kitchen chair.  The chair was sitting out on the lawn, with masking tape across one corner of the paintings frame. 

As I pondered what the scene meant, I remembered hearing stories about people who’ve cleaned out attics and inadvertently sold valuable masterpieces, by artists like Rembrandt or Picasso; sometimes getting as little as five or ten dollars at a yard sale.  Obviously, the people, who found those old pictures, had no idea of their value; and as I continued to meditate on this, a deeper understanding began to emerge.

The most obvious meaning of this picture was that God considers each of His children to be a masterpiece, regardless of whether they’ve ever been treated like one.  Sadly, when you’ve been handled like old junk, it becomes easier to believe that’s what you are.  But in truth, the real value of a masterpiece is not diminished by the failure of its beholder to understand its worth.  It is the one who undervalues the artifact who ultimately suffers the loss.

Few would argue God’s credentials as a “Master” Creator; but just as it is with the Master Painters here on earth, some might want to quibble over His “greater” and “lesser” works.   Yet to the artist, each work is an expression of their inner being, each is valuable and irreplaceable.  One painting might get more attention than another, one may bring more profit, but each one is of equal value in reflecting the heart and vision of its creator.  Undoubtedly, if those who looked upon such a painting, with untrained eyes, had known the name of the artist, they may have had some greater sense of its worth.

Genuine art lovers can often pick up subtle details in a picture that an unskilled or maybe even an uncaring eye might miss.  They can often derive much more significance from a work than someone who only scans for the obvious; and so it is with us. 

We may not always see the beauty in people, but how often have we really looked for it.  We may not always understand what the Creator was trying to convey to us, but simply knowing who created them should make these works valuable to us.  While this may be difficult with some people, it may be most difficult as we look in the mirror.  I sense that God’s heart is just as grieved when we don’t understand our own value to Him, as when we don’t see the value in others.

I believe that God wants us to be like the lovers of great art; to look deeply into His creation and to find Him in it.  The scripture says that the invisible qualities of God are found in the things He created and that we were created in His own image. 

I sense that He is calling us to look past the obvious (love covers a multitude of sins) and to find the beauty He’s placed inside of each one of His children.  Once we find it, I believe that He would have us cultivate (i.e. to shine the light on and water) it.  Isn’t that what Jesus did? 

He didn’t focus on the flaws or mistakes; He treated each one as precious and valuable.  We can see that people were transformed by that (e.g. the woman at the well, the woman taken from the bed of adultery, the woman at the well, Zacchaeus…). 

Jesus told the apostles that people would know His followers by the way that they loved each other.  Is that how people know us church folk?  How much of a difference would it make if we sought the beauty that God placed in each person and if we truly valued them as a unique creation, from the hands of a Master Artist.  If our hearts are going to align with His, we are going to have to become more passionate about those He created.

Read Full Post »

Lord, I know that You have given me the measure of faith that I need; but please help me to find that faith within myself, so that You might be glorified in my life.

Son, what do you suppose is the “ultimate act of faith”?

I’m not sure Lord; I guess things like healing the sick, raising the dead or walking on water seem to be the ones that are held in the highest regard.

Not many men have been a party to such things.

No, I’m sure that they haven’t; I guess that’s why they’re held in such esteem.

The ultimate act of faith is also incredibly rare.

What is it Lord?

“The ultimate act of faith is to love with abandon.”

What exactly does it mean to “love with abandon”?

It means to be so given over to love that you do not protect yourself; to love those who will not love you back; to bless those who are taking advantage of you; to forgive those who have hurt you; to love without the expectation of receiving anything in return.

Wow Lord, that answer is somehow unexpected; I guess I never made that kind of connection between faith and love.

Faith, hope and love are three chords woven together into a strand.  The way to love without protecting yourself is to rely on Me to guard your heart.  The way to love those who will not love you back is to see them through My eyes and to rely on Me for your fulfillment.  The way to bless those who take advantage of you is to view Me as your source and as your vindicator.  The way to forgive those who’ve hurt you is to recognize how you’ve been forgiven through Me; and the way to love without an expectation of return is to trust that I will work all things to the good of those who love Me and who are called to My purposes.

I see Your point, but love and forgiveness seem like ordinary, everyday occurrences; while things like walking on water or raising the dead defy the laws of nature and are incredibly rare.

Believe me son, unselfish love and genuine forgiveness are far more rare than you could fathom; and for a man to “love with abandon”, he must defy his own nature, which is a far more difficult thing.  It requires far less of an investment of faith to raise the dead than it does to look into the eyes of someone who has hurt you and to release them from that debt; and it takes less faith to walk on water than it does to walk beside someone and keep no record of wrongdoing.  You may never walk on water, but if you love with all of your heart, mind, soul and strength, all of the law will be fulfilled; on the other hand, you could have the faith to move mountains, but if you have not love, you have nothing.  Faith is not simply believing in the impossible, it is believing that through Me, all things are possible.

I want to love and believe like that Lord.

Trust Me Son, it’s your destiny.

Read Full Post »

 

Then, He said that a seed had been deposited within us; that He had “impregnated us” with something new. 

 

And while that seemed very hopeful, I quickly sensed a troubling question, “Will you carry this seed to full term?” 

 

The Lord reminded me that we live in a time in which the unborn are easily disposed of, and He said that “the church” is just as likely to abort the things He is trying to birth in the spiritual realm, as the world is in the natural realm. 

 

He showed me that many abortions happen as a matter of convenience, while others happen because of fear.  Some aren’t willing to endure the pain, others lack commitment to the relationship which resulted in the pregnancy, and still others because they don’t want family or friends to know who they’ve been with. 

 

 

While conception is a miraculous beginning, it is simply the start of a season of feeding, growth and development that precedes the actual birth.  What happens within that season determines whether a healthy live birth will take place. 

The question isn’t whether God desires intimacy with us; or whether that intimacy will lead to reproduction; but whether we are willing to endure the process and carry the promise to fruition. 

Read Full Post »

I was raised to believe that marriage is a “sacred institution”, and like so many of the ideas I grew up with, I never really questioned it.  Even now, the concept still sounds reasonable to my ears.  But in our years of trying to represent God’s heart to hurting people, the Lord has opened the eyes of my understanding in terms of what truly matters to Him. 

I will warn you that I’ve never heard anything like this preached anywhere, and as with everything I share, I encourage you to test it by the Holy Spirit (which is significantly different than pondering how it might make you feel).

I should also preface this article with the fact that I have been divorced.  For some that will taint my perspective, and for others it might lend some weight to it.  I mention this because I have personally wrestled to understand God’s perspective on such things.  I was raised to believe that marriage was forever, and that was always my plan.  But when my first marriage was derailed (after 12 years) by infidelity, I found myself in a category that I never wanted to be in. 

Despite this painful betrayal, I worked for over a year to keep the door open for reconciliation, even when my Christian friends pointed out that I had biblical grounds to end the marriage (Matt.19:9).  When it was obvious that the relationship could not be mended, I still found myself wrestling with the notion of the “sin of divorce”, and the Lord said, “the sin occurred when you chose to build a life without me, and the divorce is simply the natural consequence of that.”

God’s design for marriage is that two people, who are equally yoked (i.e. on the same path, headed to the same destination, near the same point in the journey…) would join their lives together, and that the new entity formed by their union would be a conduit for new life to flow to and from them.  His intent is to create something greater than the sum of its parts, and that on this foundation He can build families, communities, and ultimately nations. 

The impact of a marriage done God’s way can be felt throughout the generations.  Unfortunately, the damage and destruction done by unions that don’t live up to this standard also resonate well beyond the failed relationship itself.  This potential was at the root of God’s prohibition of intermarrying with pagan tribes.

At the center of a marriage is the covenantal promise, and there is no question that such vows are sacred to God.  Entering into any sort of covenantal relationship is a very serious matter, and a step that should not be undertaken without the Lord’s guidance.  Unfortunately, we live in a culture where almost nothing is sacred, and relationships are frequently treated as a disposable commodity. 

Given the widely held notion that the truth is relative, one only needs to conjure a “new truth” in order to void the terms of their oath.  With the simple matter of letting our “yes be yes”, and our “no be no” (Matt.5:37), already in question, every relationship can hang precariously from a weak-willed vow. 

I would suggest that this common flaw in our collective character is viewed as sinful by a holy God, even before we actually break our promises.  It is evidence of our failure to fully surrender to Him and to His purposes.

The conundrum before us is how to respond in the face of such failures, and it was in the process of attempting to provide wise counsel to those with marital difficulties that the Lord began to change my view of such things.  Given the (previously mentioned) frivolous approach towards relationships, it is easy to understand the temptation for ministers of the Lord to double down on the serious nature of divorce.  Indeed, God does hate divorce (Mal.2:16), but have we ever stopped to ponder why that is?

In our years of ministering we’ve frequently encountered folks (most often women) who find themselves in the midst of a destructive relationship.  In many of those instances there was sustained emotional, mental and physical abuse occurring, with children often trapped within the crossfire.  Sadly, the consistent counsel that these individuals received from Christian sources (i.e. counselors, pastors, church leaders…) was that God hates divorce, and He expects you to endure whatever it takes to remain in the marriage.  Implicitly, this indicates that the “Institution of Marriage” is so sacred to God that He expects individuals to suffer whatever abuse is necessary to preserve it.

As I prayed for and about these situations the Lord confronted the notion of the “Institution of Marriage”.  He said that institutions are things that man creates, and that they are not sacred to Him.  He showed me that the sacred element of a marriage is the people involved within it, and He posed the question, “Was man created for marriage, or was marriage created for man?”  This of course mirrors Jesus’ challenge to the Pharisee’s about healing on the Sabbath (Mark 2:27), which was His way of telling them that they were not reflecting God’s heart in their attempt to be guardians of His law.  From this, I inferred that we were similarly missing the mark.

At the point that a marriage has become a conduit for manipulation, abuse, and destruction, it has completely perverted God’s design and desire.  And when a spouse no longer honors their vow to love, serve and protect, the covenant promise is already shattered (regardless of their legal marital status). 

God’s hatred for divorce isn’t rooted in the damage it does to the “Institution of Marriage”, it is in the destruction it does to the people involved.  And if that is so, then God also “hates” the marriage that falls into this condition.  The concept that He is somehow served by continuing on with such a facade is highly questionable.  In fact, Jesus said that a house divided against itself cannot stand (Mark 3:25).

To be sure, if two people were able to completely submit to the Lord’s authority, and to obey the things He told them, there is no relationship that He couldn’t heal.  Of course, two people who were willing and able to do such a thing wouldn’t likely find themselves in such a dilemma.  But if one or both choose to exercise their own will, God will not force them to stay together. 

Certainly, their divorce would be sinful, but so would continuing on in this divided state.  The decision to do so only perpetuates the damage, and allows it to spread like cancer throughout those involved (i.e. the children, the in-laws, friends…) and to pass down through the generations.  Indeed, children should be the natural byproduct of a healthy loving relationship, which sets the stage for them to prosper.  But children born into dysfunctional relationships become victims of the chaotic environment in which they are raised.

I once knew a man, who left his wife and children to live with his mistress.  He continued to pay the bills, but abandoned his family physically and emotionally.  Though this went on for a number of years, the man never divorced his wife.  Eventually, she became ill, and their children cared for her until her death.  After her passing, the man married the mistress. 

While this man may have been able to console himself that he wasn’t guilty of the sin of divorce, I can assure you that God was not fooled nor impressed.  If looking at a woman lustfully amounts to committing adultery in your heart (Matt.5:28), how would this evasive maneuver be accounted by God.  The damage done by this man can still be clearly seen in both his children, and grandchildren, as they all consistently struggle to sustain healthy relationships.

Such is the byproduct of counseling folks that divorce is never an option.  By sending a spouse back into a destructive, or even abusive situation, the marriage becomes an instrument of annihilation.  If maintaining the union means that neither the spouses nor their children ever become who they were created to be, God is neither served nor glorified.  Though we know that what God has joined together no man should separate (Matt.19:6), what happens when we join ourselves together (as I did in my first marriage) without His input or guidance?

Part of God’s redemptive nature is that He will allow diseased things to be destroyed so that they can be replaced with new life.  He cuts off unhealthy branches (John 15:2), he curses unfruitful trees (Matt.21:19), and when we build our house on the wrong foundation, He allows storms to wash it away (Matt.7:26-27).  He goes so far as to say that if our eye causes us to sin, we would be better off to gouge it out than to continue on in our sinful state (Matt.5:29). 

This is significant, because it was God Himself that gave us two eyes, both as a gift and a provision, yet He’s saying that if this gift becomes perverted, it is better that we lose it.  I would suggest that this could apply to the gift of marriage as well. 

I am not in any way trying to diminish the seriousness of divorce, or the sacred nature of marriage vows.  But I am challenging the presumption that it is always God’s will to preserve a marriage, regardless of what it might cost or where it might lead.

Most certainly God hates divorce, but He also hates haughty eyes, a lying tongue, false witnesses, and people who stir up conflict within a community (Prov.6:16-19).  To single out divorce, and make it the unforgivable sin is a distortion of His heart.

As with all things, we need to learn how to be led by the Spirit of God in these matters, and to not trot out the same old rote religious responses we grew up with.  Only He knows the truth of men’s hearts (Jer.17:9), only He has the words of life (John 6:68), and only He knows the end from the beginning (Isa.46:10).  We need to be saying what He is saying, and not be saying what He is not saying (John 5:19-20).

Read Full Post »

Anointed and anointing are relatively ancient terms, used extensively throughout the Old Testament, and to a lesser degree in the New Testament.  For the most part they simply refer to the practice of applying various oils or balms for things like healing, consecration, and/or preparation for burial.  Because there isn’t much modern context for these words, they are easily manipulated to take on a host of other connotations.  To be sure, they have become part of the popular vernacular within charismatic circles.

In the days of the temple, Priests had to be anointed with a specific blend of oils prior to entering the Holy of Holies, lest they perish, and the Kings of Israel were anointed with oil to signify that they were chosen by God and commissioned to His service.  Like the Priests, the failure to uphold this high calling could result in dire consequences for both the King and his family line.

The modern usage of these terms seems to be aimed at this idea of being specifically chosen (or called) by God, along with a sense of being uniquely gifted (or equipped) in one area or another.  But generally, omits the aesthetic of being bound by an oath to faithfully represent its source, or to acknowledge the potential destruction that could accompany its misuse.  Indeed, those who profess to have an “anointing” often appear to be like children, who’ve gotten ahold of their father’s credit card, and don’t realize that he’ll see the billing statement at the end of the month.

Even those who are sincere in their commitment to serve the Lord can fall to the intoxication of consistently watching God work through their gift, and the earthly treasures/accolades that may result from that.  Over time they can become convinced that this has more to do with who they are rather than simply being a byproduct of the Father’s generosity. 

In those moments they need loving brothers and sisters to help them to see their folly.  But within the current Charismatic culture, they would likely be chastened for “coming against God’s anointed ones”.  The implication being that these individuals’ gifts and callings somehow exempt them from being questioned or receiving any kind of reproach.  This, of course, is a profound distortion of that particular passage of scripture, and of what it means to be “anointed” in general.

One of the clearest pictures of what anointing is, and isn’t can be found in the story of Saul and David.

Because we know how the story ends, it’s easy to pass over the details at the beginning.  Saul did not promote himself to the position of king, nor was he nominated by his peers, he was literally picked out of the crowd (1Sam.9:17) and chosen by God (1Sam.10:24).  At that time, he was humble (1Sam.9:21), anointed (1Sam.10:1), gifted (1Sam.10:13), and God had done a work in his heart (1Sam.10:9).  And for a substantial period of time, Saul walked in that calling and anointing (i.e. 1Sam.11), fulfilling God’s purposes in his life.  

But, as previously alluded to, sustained seasons of victory, and the praise of men eventually eroded Saul’s humility to the point that he felt empowered (or commissioned) to make decisions of his own (1Sam.15:9).

It wasn’t as if he stopped wanting to serve God, but his pride and greed caused him to overstep the bounds of his authority. 

God’s response was quick and definitive (1Sam.15:11 & 23), and it’s hard not to see the parallel between his story and the narratives surrounding so many “anointed” (i.e. called, gifted, empowered) ministry leaders who’ve fallen throughout church history, and in the recent past.

At the point David refused to lay his hands on “God’s anointed one” (1Sam.24:10), it was clear to him and everyone else that Saul had been rejected as the king of Israel.  This passage is pointing towards David’s unwillingness to act without specific direction from the Lord, which is a foreshadowing of Jesus’ pledge that He couldn’t do anything without direct guidance from the Father.  It is meant as an advocation of David’s heart, not a defense of Saul’s immutable position or calling.  

Nothing in scripture supports the idea that calling, gifting, anointing… exempts a person from accountability, indeed quite the opposite is true (James 3:1).  Within these stories, we see Samuel soundly rebuke Saul (1Sam.15:17-19), just as Nathan strongly rebukes David for his transgression with Bathsheba (2Sam.12:1-7).  Chastening a king was a dangerous activity, even for a recognized prophet, but it was exactly what God called them to do.

Another related aspect revealed in these stories occurs toward the end of David’s reign, when he wants to build the temple.  When he inquires of the prophet Nathan, he’s told that God is with him, and that he should do as he pleases (2Sam.7:3).  There is nothing recorded that indicates that Nathan inquired of the Lord for this answer, and it appears as to have come from his experience of being alongside David as he wins battle after battle. 

It was a completely reasonable conclusion to draw, and on the surface, it seemed true, as God clearly was with David.  But when Nathan actually takes the time to inquire of the Lord (2Sam.7:4), the answer is much different than he or anyone else expected.

This phenomenon is frequently played out in the modern context, as truly gifted people, who have eyes to see, are blinded by someone’s position, title, resume, success, giftings, callings, anointing…  Like these prophets, they may have been called by God to confront issues, but they defer to what they see with their natural senses, or what they perceive to be a higher authority. 

Nathan’s rebuke of David allowed for him to repent, and to step back into the fullness of his calling.  It’s hard not to believe that God hasn’t extended this same grace to so many other ministers who fell because no one was willing to confront them as they veered off course.  Unfortunately, we have created a culture that struggles to tolerate such an encounter.

Perhaps even more repulsive than simply misusing God’s anointing for our own selfish gain is the ongoing mystification of these gifts in order to create the illusion of an elite religious class of ministry leaders, designed to rule and guide the less gifted working-class sheep (i.e. laity). 

In his letter to the Ephesians (chapter 4), Paul describes a mature body of believers, in which every part is directly connected to the head, and each part supplies something for the greater whole.  The “Five-Fold” gifts described in this chapter are intended to help facilitate this maturing process, not to exacerbate the clergy-laity division that has plagued the church throughout history.  As Paul explained to Timothy (1Tim.2:5), there is only meant to be one intermediary between God and man, and His name is Jesus.

Ultimately, our present use of the phrase “the anointing” is something of a misnomer.  Before Christ, access to the power and authority of the Holy Spirit was limited to a chosen few.  But because of Christ’s sacrifice, all believers have a direct connection to the indwelling Spirit.  All who belong to Him can rightfully be classified as “anointed” (2Cor.1:21, 1John 2:20).

Holy Spirit empowered giftings are not expensive presents that God only bestows upon His favorite kids, they are tools provided to faithful followers, which He intends to use to draw men unto Himself.  An anointing was never intended to be something we could possess.  It is simply a garment, provided by the Lord, which allows us to serve His purposes.  Walking in that anointing will test the depths of our humility.  Like the treasures that the children of Israel carried out of Egypt, it can be our provision, or we can use it to form some sort of lifeless idol.

Read Full Post »

In the gospels Jesus warned that “unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven (Matt.18:3).”  Then, in the epistles, Paul also warns against childish ways of acting (1Cor.13:11) and thinking (1Cor.14:20).  In light of these admonishments, it seems vital that we should learn and discern the difference between being childlike and being childish.

Paul appears to address some of these childish patterns when he wrote to the Galatians, calling out things like discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissentions, factions… (Gal.5:19-20), ultimately concluding that those who live like this would not inherit the Kingdom of God.  And from his description of God’s love to the Corinthians (1Cor.13:4-7), things like being impatient, unforgiving, competitive, easily offended, and quick tempered could also be included. 

While all of these traits are commonplace within the typical human experience, God is calling His children to something higher.  Jesus said that anyone who was not willing to take up their cross and follow Him was unworthy of Him (Matt.10:38).  While Paul pointed out the need to “crucify the flesh” (Gal.5:24), and Peter spoke of partaking of the divine nature (2Pet.1:4).  This is all a part of the transformation that God intends to work in those who follow Him.

More important than simply misbehaving is the issue of trusting the Father and accepting what we cannot hope to fully comprehend.  The scripture contains numerous passages which reference the limitations of our understanding.  We know in part and prophesy in part (1Cor.13:9).  We see as through a glass dimly (1Cor.13:12).  God’s ways are higher than our ways (Isaiah 55:8-9). The wisdom of man is foolishness to God (1Cor.1:25). He can do exceedingly, abundantly more than we could ask for or imagine (Eph.3:20).  If we must have foreknowledge and certainty in order to believe, we are sure to be disheartened.  In order to be effective, our faith must be “childlike”.

In many ways, what God offered mankind in the garden was the chance to be His children.  Had Adam and Eve chosen to follow His direction, they could have lived out their days naked, unashamed, unburdened, and completely unaware of sickness, evil and death.  They would have simply existed within the bubble of the Father’s love and protection.  But something within their nature found the offer of autonomy (i.e. self-rule) to be too good to pass up.

I see this demonstrated clearly in my young granddaughter, who lives with us.  She is a precious, beautiful child, who is bold, energetic, and full of curiosity.  Not surprisingly, she wasn’t even ten months old when she started walking, and containing her became a daily challenge. 

When the playpen proved to be too restrictive for this 20 lb. force of nature, we fenced in our living room with plastic fencing in order to keep her from the fireplace, the stereo cabinet, bookshelves, electrical outlets… and we constructed a gate, so that us older folks didn’t have to hurdle our way in to, and out of, the living room. 

Within this room sized play yard, we placed all manner of soft, colorful, musical, and educational things for her to engage with.  Above all else it was intended to be a safe space for her to learn and grow; but from its inception she made it her mission to escape from it. 

In this quest, she’s demonstrated amazing resourcefulness, as she’s tried to pull the fence up to crawl underneath it; to slide herself between the seams in the panels, and to push the fence (or gate) down.  When those efforts failed, she’s pushed her rocking chair, or her wheeled horse to the fence, and tried to use them to climb over it. 

Often times, she’d stand at the gate, and shake it by its bars.  Every time the gate would open, she would stop what she was doing and run toward it.  Every time the gate would close, she’d let out a yelp of protest.  Indeed, the mere existence of this fence seems to be an affront to her soul.  Even without any conscious understanding of it, she instinctively pushed against the concept of limitations or boundaries.

Anyone who’s raised a child, or spent any amount of time with a toddler can probably attest to the fact that these behaviors are not particularly unusual for children at that stage, and I feel sure that to some degree they are a reflection of our unvarnished human nature.  Over time, we will likely train this little girl to behave differently, but these patterns provide some insight into how humans respond in their natural state.

As I have prayed for this little one, the Lord has impressed upon me that this is how it is with His children as well.  Like us, He tried to setup a safe and ideal situation for them, but they chose to go their own way.  He then tried to create healthy boundaries to keep them safe, but they perceive that He is trying to keep them from the “good stuff”, and rebel against them.  Indeed, the very idea that He would set limitations causes many to doubt His goodness. 

Because we are created in God’s image, children come with an undefiled capacity to love and trust, but they also possess a natural penchant toward self-centeredness and impatience.  Sorting through these conflicting traits is part of stepping into our identities as Children of God. 

There is a way that naturally seems right to a man, but it ultimately leads to death (Pro.14:12), and apart from God we can do nothing (John 15:5).  Given mankind’s aforementioned love of independence, the struggle to humble ourselves and surrender our mind, will, and emotions to the Lord’s purposes is a moment by moment battle.

Jesus said, that “anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it (Mark 10:15, Luke 19:17)”.  And, He openly thanked the Father for concealing these things from the wise & learned, choosing instead to reveal them to the “little children” (Matt.11:25, Luke 10:21).  This means that we can neither earn or learn our way into the kingdom.

Scripture tells us that God resists the proud (James 4:6), and Jesus’ ministry clearly reflects this.  We don’t see Him publicly shaming prostitutes and thieves for their sin, but we do see Him openly confronting the prideful religious leaders, who’d counted themselves as righteous.  We don’t see Him flipping tables in the marketplace because of people’s iniquity, but we do see Him flipping tables in the temple because of their misrepresentation of the Father’s heart (Matt.21-12).  Indeed, judgement begins in the house of God (1 Pet.4:17).

The Kingdom of God is not a location, it is a supernatural state of living in submission to His Lordship.  Jesus modeled this pattern for us during His time on the earth, as He refused to act apart from His Father’s will.  Because of this He could truthfully claim, “if you’ve seen me, you’ve seen the Father (John 14:7)”.

When I was a child, I used to sit in the back seat of our family car, staring at the passing scenery, and wondering at the world.  I was never burdened by thoughts of where we might be going, or what route we would take to get there, because my father was driving, and I had utter confidence in his judgement, and ability to get us there safely.  I would submit that this is a fair representation of the journey the Lord intends for us.

He offers us a peace that surpasses understanding, joy unspeakable, unshakable hope, and profound rest.  I would submit that this is a reflection of what He initially offered mankind in the garden, and it is the fruit of genuinely abiding in the vine, and within the shelter of His sovereign grace.  But like Adam, He gives us the option to live as His children, or to live by our own sense of what is right.

“For those who are led by the Spirit of God are the children of God. The Spirit you received does not make you slaves, so that you live in fear again; rather, the Spirit you received brought about your adoption to sonship.[f] And by him we cry, “Abba,[g] Father.” The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God’s children. Now if we are children, then we are heirs—heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory (Rom.8:14-17).”

Read Full Post »

Some would describe love as a powerful emotion, while others might claim that, “love is a choice” and to some degree, there is truth in both of those statements.  There are indeed strong emotions that accompany love, though I would submit that the feelings themselves do not constitute its substance.  Likewise, there is a conscious decision involved in entrusting our hearts to someone else’s care.  Though both of those elements are integral to the overall process, neither fully encapsulate the nature of love itself.  Ultimately, love is a relational dynamic that exists between two entities.

In western culture, we tend to gravitate toward the emotional end of the scale.  Often times, our concept of love is little more than a volume knob for our affection.  If it stirs up positive feelings, we say that we “like” it, but if it stirs up intensely positive emotions, we claim to “love” it.  But again, love amounts to more than just the magnitude of our feelings.

Often times the intense desire to be with someone is rooted in something other than love for them.  One can certainly be strongly attracted to another, but that would more rightly be characterized as lust.  Loneliness, or the fear of being alone can produce extreme emotions, just as hurt and insecurity can, but they rarely produce healthy, loving relationships.  More often, they result in unbalanced, emotionally manipulative, or co-dependent dynamics that are ultimately destructive. 

One of the byproducts of the sexual revolution is a quid-pro-quo aesthetic, where relationships are largely viewed as vehicles to get what we want out of life.  Instead of finding the value in a partner, we look for ways to leverage each other, both emotionally and practically.

We can love what someone brings to our life (e.g. stability, support, security, the feeling of being wanted…), without ever really loving them.  In such cases, that person becomes a tool for our pursuit of happiness.  Their job is to fulfill whatever role we assign them in our lives, but their value is in the results they produce.  If that diminishes, they can be replaced by someone who produces better results.  It’s like trading your phone in for a newer model.

Aside from the strong emotions involved, there are the mechanics of the relationship itself.  People can have genuine affection for one another, but divergent perspectives, value systems, and/or goals, which can create an almost constant discord.  It is said that opposites attract, but that doesn’t mean that they live happily ever after.  It is a rare relationship that can sustain that type of relentless conflict, and just because we possess strong feelings for someone doesn’t mean that the relationship can overcome it. 

I believe that this is why the scripture admonishes that spouses should be equally yoked.  In biblical times, a yoke was a rigid piece of wood.  If the oxen weren’t moving at the same pace, the faster one was carrying the entire load.  If they were moving in even slightly different directions, they were literally pulling against each other.  I would suggest that this passage is saying something more than simply Christians should only marry other Christians.

The Bible gives a very clear definition of what love is, “Love is patient. Love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.  It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.  Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth.  It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.(1Cor.13:4-7)” 

If you read those words slowly, and thoughtfully, they can be pretty intimidating.  Is this how the people we claim to love would describe our demeanor toward them?  For that matter, would any of us claim that these are characteristic of the “love” we profess to have? 

To that end, we like to rationalize that the love described in the scripture is really just God’s (agape) love, and that we simply possess some lower form of (Eros or Philo) love.  We further like to dissect it into categories like brotherly/sisterly love, and romantic love; and then blur the lines even further with statements like, “I love them, but I’m not in love with them…”. 

Ultimately, God takes these caveats away with the command to, “love one another as I have loved you (John 13:34)”.  The God who is love, specifically tells us what love is to Him, and then lets us know that He expects us to love one another that way.  He makes no provision for some lower form of affection or fascination, which is too often characterized by traits like selfishness, vanity, envy, manipulation, scorekeeping and destructiveness; all of which are so directly counter to His definition that they could not be considered a watered-down version of the same.

Considering that the Lord Himself boiled down the whole of the law to the quality of our love (for Him and for each other), and that He said that the way people will be able to distinguish His children was by the love they have for one another, our concept of what “love” is makes a huge difference.  Perhaps, our understanding of what love is can be enhanced by considering what it is not:

It’s Not Really Love

It’s not really love

just because I was stirred at the first sight of you

*

and

It’s not really love

simply because I like the way you make me feel

*

and

It’s not really love

just because you fill a void in my existence

*

and

It’s not really love

simply because I appreciate all that you’ve done for me

*

and

It’s not really love

just because I feel drawn to you

*

and

It’s not really love

simply because I like to think of you as mine

*

and

It’s not really love

just because I want what you bring to my life

*

no

It’s not really love

until it stops being about what I think I want or need

*

and

It starts being about who You are

Read Full Post »

Hear the voice of the prophets echoing from their exile!

How long shall you waiver between two opinions?

Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God?

Shall you continue to forsake your commission in some vain pursuit of happiness?

Shall you continue to sleep, but find no rest?

Shall you continue to cling to your comfort, while turning away the Comforter?

Whose banner is flying over you?

Whose words are on your lips?

Who will douse your burning barns?

From where shall your help come from?

How long shall you waiver between two opinions?

How long?

 

Read Full Post »

As this Corona Virus crisis began to ramp up a few of weeks ago, I tried to block it out. I’m not one who looks to interpret what God may be thinking by observing natural events; I’m more prone to see natural events through the lens of whatever He seems to be saying at the moment. But as events began to pile up, I started to get pulled into the conversation. I read credible Infectious Disease experts who said that this virus wasn’t much more hazardous than the seasonal Influenza virus, which also kills those with compromised immune systems, while other medical experts were speaking as though it was the return of the black plague. Like everything else in our culture, this virus soon became a political volleyball, which was being pounded back and forth across the net. As the preventive measures began costing people their jobs, and I saw people begin to suffer, I felt the frustration brewing in me, and stealing my peace. I found myself formulating an argument in my head, and it seemed to be pressing on my lips to get out. But before it was able to escape, the Lord broke in.

 

“What do you know?”

 

It wasn’t in a sarcastic or mocking tone. He was asking a simple and sincere question about what “facts” I had. There seemed to be credible voices on both sides of the argument, and everyone seemed to be speaking as though they knew exactly what was happening, and moreover, what was going to happen. But the Lord was challenging me, as a man who felt as though he had something to say, as to what I really knew. And in an instant, I knew that my words were of no value, and that my voice would just be more fodder in the trough. As I began to fully appreciate the degree to which I’d been sucked in, the Lord spoke again.

 

“What do you know?”

 

Though the words were the same, I sensed a different question. He wasn’t asking me what I knew about the Corona Virus, He was reminding me of the way He’s taught me to deal with the world. He’s given me “eyes to see” and “ears to hear”, so that I can live by every word that proceeds from His mouth. He was challenging me on what He’d said to me about this virus and/or pandemic, and as I pondered that, I realized that He’d not mentioned it one time. Again, a wave of regret washed over me, as I remembered that the “genuine Spirit of Prophecy is not only saying what God is saying, but it’s not saying what He’s not saying”. Indeed, if God wasn’t speaking about these things to me, what exactly did I have to say to anyone else. In the midst of my repentance, the Lord spoke again.

 

“What do you know?”

 

Again, same words, different question. This time He was striking at the depth of my soul. What is it that I “know” in my heart? “I know you Lord”, was all I could think to say. And with that, I sensed His loving hand on my shoulder, and I understood that this was all I would ever need to know.

 

Like everyone else, we are being impacted by what’s happening in our world. And now, more than ever, I find myself running back to the one thing that I know.

 

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »