Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The Follower

The music seemed especially loud at this morning’s service and the congregation was really into it, but I was way too tired for all of that. The ballgame had gone into extra innings last night, and so I didn’t get to bed until the wee small hours of the morning. My wife Karen had warned me that I’d be “tired at church”, when she headed off to bed around 10:00 p.m. But, as usual, I pretended not to hear her. She, of course, was one of the first people up dancing and clapping to the worship. Periodically, she’d turn and shoot me a look of disapproval for sitting in my chair. She acted as if I was embarrassing her. But I figured that I wasn’t the only one sitting, and that she just needed to get over it. At the church I grew up in the service would have been over in an hour, you could have set your watch by it. If the service ran over by even three minutes you could hear everyone grumbling in the parking lot. But at this church we did the worship thing for at least an hour, and then the pastor would get up and preach for another hour, so there was no relief in sight. Suddenly, the music shifted from the upbeat praise songs to the slower worship type songs. In the midst of that the pastor encouraged people to gather around the altar and to pray. Though I wasn’t particularly moved by all of this, I saw it as an opening to catch a little rest. While I wasn’t one to lay prostrate on the floor while praying, I’d seen other people do it lots of times. Sometimes they’d be there for the whole service. I always figured that they must be sleeping, and so I thought that this might be a great way to get Karen off my back, to keep the pastor happy, and maybe to even catch a little nap. I got down on the floor and buried my head in my hands, so that no one could see whether I was awake or asleep. After a few minutes I found myself drifting into that half-awake, half-asleep, dream state; as the sound of the music began to fade in my ears.

After what seemed to be a very short time something within me shuddered violently, effectively shaking me awake. But as I opened my eyes I realized that I was no longer lying on the floor in the church; instead I was sitting on a hard wooden chair, in what appeared to be a large room. As the fog in my head continued to lift I recognized that this room was a courtroom, and that I was seated at the defendants table. I was pretty sure that this must be a dream, but I was kind of curious about what might happen next, so I didn’t try to snap out of it. Though the sounds in the room were muffled in my ears, I sensed that the prosecuting attorney was making his opening statements to the jury. His back was to me, but I could see that he was dressed in a long robe and that he was wearing sandals. When he finally turned I realized that it was Jesus. I could see both sadness and compassion in His eyes as He made His way back to the table. I felt a knot forming in my gut as my mind desperately tried to conjure a scenario in which this arrangement might be a good thing. At that moment, my lawyer rose to his feet, grabbed a large book off the table, and moved toward the jury box. My hearing suddenly seemed to grow more acute as I could hear his expensive looking shoes click across the floor. In stark contrast to Jesus’ appearance, my lawyer looked like something off the pages of GQ magazine, and he moved in a very definitive manner. Though I hadn’t really had the chance to look him in the face, I sensed that he must be a relatively young man. As he reached the jury box he opened the large book and began to speak.

“Ladies and Gentleman of the jury, I think that you will find that reaching a verdict in this case will be fairly simple if you keep the definition of one term in mind, and that term is ‘follower’. Here in the Webster’s, that term is defined as one who follows the teachings or opinions of another; one that imitates another; one that chases another; or even as a part of a machine that is moved by another part of the machine. As we work our way through this proceeding I ask that you keep this definition clear in your minds. Thank you.”

Just as quickly as he had risen from the table, he thumped the dictionary closed, and spun to return. When our eyes met, I sensed something like contempt in his face, and as he moved closer I couldn’t shake the idea that this was Lucifer himself. A sick feeling washed over me as he sat down without acknowledging me. I tipped my chair back slightly, and slipped my foot beneath it, in hopes that I could exert enough pressure to cause me to wake up from this dream. Despite crushing my foot to the point that tears were streaming down my face the dream continued.

My thoughts began to swirl in the confusion of the moment. What is it that I’m accused of? Why would Jesus be a Prosecutor? Is my lawyer really Lucifer? Why can’t I wake up from this dream? I became even more confused when I looked to the bench and realized that the judges’ chair was empty. Just then, Jesus stood to his feet, and moved toward the Bailiff with a piece of paper in His hand. He addressed the empty chair as if someone were sitting in it, saying “Your honor the state wishes to enter this document as ‘State Exhibit A’.” He handed the paper to the Bailiff, and turned back to the jury, saying, “It is the signed confession of the defendant, Mr. Richard Davis. And upon this confession the State rests its case.” Jesus quietly made His way back to His chair as the courtroom was suddenly abuzz with reaction to the evidence.

My heart sank at the realization that whatever my particular crime might be I had already confessed my guilt. It suddenly made sense to me that Jesus would be the prosecutor, as He is always on the side of truth. I don’t know what argument my lawyer thought that he might bring to counter a signed confession, but he wasted no time in getting to work. He quickly stood to his feet and began to speak. “Your honor, if it pleases the court, the defense would like to call the defendant, Richard F. Davis to the stand.” He shot an impatient glance toward me as I stumbled to my feet, and every eye in the courtroom seemed to be on me as I shuffled forward. My foot ached from my attempts to expel myself from this dream, and I tried not to limp as I made my way to the Bailiff. After being sworn in, I climbed into the witness chair, took a deep breath, and wondered what was about to happen.

“For the record, please state your full name.”

“Richard Franklin Davis.”

“So, Mr. Davis, are you married?”

“Yes sir, I am.”

“And how long have you been married?”

“It will be sixteen years in June.”

“Well, congratulations, that’s very impressive in this day and age. And how did you meet your wife?”

“We were high school sweethearts.”

“Really and how long did you know her before you decided that she was ‘the one’?”

“Well, I guess I knew the first time I saw her. I remember telling my best friend that I would marry her before I ever had the chance to actually speak to her.”

“Ah, love at first sight. She must have been very attractive.”
“Definitely, she was a cheerleader.”

“How nice, and do you have any children?”

“Yes sir, we have two children.”

“And how old are they?”

“Well our daughter, Tiffany, is fourteen, and our son, Bruce, is twelve.”

“And how did you decide on the names Tiffany and Bruce?”

‘Well, I’m a little embarrassed to admit this, but Tiffany was my wife’s idea. ‘Breakfast at Tiffany’s’ is her favorite movie. Since she got to pick the girl name, I got to name the boy, and Bruce Springsteen has always been my favorite singer.”

“Ah yes, ‘The Boss’.”

“Absolutely!”

I was a little embarrassed by the enthusiasm that came across in my response, but I guess I was feeling somewhat relieved by the innocuous questions he was asking. I didn’t really understand what the point of all of this was, but I guessed that he was just trying to let the jury know that I was a regular guy. It, once again, made me wonder what I had been accused of, and I expected that the questions were about to get more difficult, but they didn’t.

“And so what do you do for a living Mr. Davis?”

“I’m a Tax Accountant.”

“That doesn’t sound like very exciting work, is that what you’d hoped you’d be doing at this point in your life?”

“No sir, truthfully, I always wanted to either play in a rock band or to play professional baseball.”

“Why didn’t you go into one of those fields instead?”

“I wasn’t a very good baseball player, and I wasn’t much into practicing my guitar, so neither of those things materialized.”

“So how did you settle on accounting?”

“I was always good at math, and they said that accountants made good money, so I decided that was the way to go.”

“And were ‘they’ right?”

“Right about what?”

“Right about accountants making good money?”

“Oh, yes, I make a good living.”

“And where is it that you live?”

“We live in the Cherry Ridge subdivision, out towards the mall.”

“That’s a very expensive neighborhood, even for someone who makes a ‘good living’.”

“Yes, well, my wife works also.”

“Really, that must be hard on your children.”

“I really don’t think that they mind. They understand that this is what it takes to afford the kind of life that we want for them. I actually think that it’s helped them to grow up a little faster.”

“And what exactly are your aspirations for your children Mr. Davis?”

“Well, I’ve encouraged them to do well in school, so that they can get into a good college, and eventually get a good job.”

“Anything else?”

Out of the corner of my eye, I caught a glimpse of Jesus sitting at the table and I searched for something to say that might please Him.

“Well, I guess I’ve tried to teach them to be good people too.”

I sensed that my attorney had been trying to get somewhere with the idea that we lived in a nice neighborhood, and that my wife chose to work, but I couldn’t figure out where. I kept watching him, trying to figure out whether he was really defending me, or whether he was trying to set me up. Just as quickly as he’d shifted the questioning in that direction, he moved away from it.

“Mr Davis, who are the three people that you would say have had the greatest influence in your life?”

“I guess that would be my wife Karen, my mother, and probably my high school baseball coach, Mr. Simpson.”

“And what is it about these people that affected you so deeply?”

“Well, my mom was always there for me. My Dad had left when I was still a baby, so it was just the two of us. She was always a great mom, who took great care of me. My wife is really beautiful, and smart, and I’m just glad that she chose to spend her life with me. Mr. Simpson guided our baseball team to the regional finals in my senior year, and he’s been a kind of father figure to me ever since. We talk almost every week on the phone.”

“So would your answer change much if I asked you who your heroes were?”

“I guess I think of heroes as kind of larger than life characters, which for me would be, ‘The Boss, Mr. Bruce Springsteen’. He’s an amazing guy, and his music really speaks to me. For my eighteenth birthday my mother took me to the local tattoo guy, who etched ‘Born to Run” on my right arm.”

“Really, have you ever been to one of his shows?”

“Are you kidding, I’ve seen him at shows all over the country. Karen and I even planned our tenth wedding anniversary trip around seeing him in Atlantic City!”

Again I found myself somewhat embarrassed at my enthusiastic response. At first my lawyer seemed amused by it, but then he took another sharp turn.

“Do believe in the idea of God, or a ‘Higher Power’?”

“Yes sir, I was raised in church, and we are members of a church as well.”

Pointing towards Jesus, he asked, “Other than here in the courtroom, have you ever seen this man before?”

“I’ve seen pictures of Him.”

“You mean some artist’s rendering of His image.”

“Yes sir, I guess that would be accurate.”

“Have you ever had a conversation with Him?”

“I’ve prayed to Him.”

“That was not the question Mr. Davis! The question was whether you’ve ever ‘conversed’ with Him.”

“Not exactly in the way that you’re implying”

“Other than here in this courtroom, have you ever heard His voice?”

A sense of panic was beginning to rise up in me as I sensed that he was trying to make it seem as though I wasn’t even saved.

“I believe that God speaks through His Holy Word, the Bible!”

“Oh really, so can you tell the court when the last time was that God spoke to you ‘through His Holy Word’?”

I went completely blank at this question. I tried to conjure a picture of me studying the Bible or even praying, but I couldn’t. I sat there trying to find something to say, but nothing came. After a very uncomfortable period of silence, my lawyer again spoke.

“Mr. Davis, do you consider yourself to be a ‘saved’ person?”

“Yes sir, I do.”

“When you say saved, what do you mean? Saved from what?”

“Saved from an eternity in hell”

“Do you fear hell Mr. Davis?”

“Yes sir, I do.”

“Your honor, the defense has no further questions, and rests upon the testimony of the defendant.”

The Bailiff let me know that I could step down from the stand, and I felt completely drained as I made my way back to the table. Though I still had no idea what I had been accused of, I somehow felt as though I’d just walked into an ambush. It wasn’t clear to me what the jury could derive from my testimony, but I was sure that I hadn’t represented myself well. My lawyer seemed strangely pleased with all of this, which only added to my sense of confusion. I once again pressed the leg of my chair onto my throbbing foot, in hopes of waking up before the closing statements were given to the jury, but it was to no avail. After Jesus waived His option to make a closing statement, my lawyer once again sprang to his feet, and swiftly moved toward the jury.

“Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, as I mentioned at the beginning of this proceeding, I believe that reaching a verdict in this case will be quite simple as long as you bear in mind what it means to be a ‘follower’. Once again, Webster’s defines this as ‘one who follows the teachings or opinions of another; one that imitates another; one that chases another or even as a part of a machine that is moved by another part of the machine.’ In light of the defendant’s testimony, I cannot find one shred of evidence that he meets any of those criteria. As he testified about the most significant elements of his life, we learned that he chose his life’s mate based solely on his physical attraction to her. By his own admission he hadn’t even spoken to her, and yet he knew that this was ‘the one for him’. Again, in his own words, he chose his life’s work based on the potential to make money, and it sounds as if he’s guiding his children to do the same. In light of the definition, it would seem that money, and a nice home in ‘Cherry Ridge’, are the part of the machine that drive him. And what can we say that he’s been chasing? From his testimony, I gather that he’s chased his hero across the country. He’s even tattooed his body, and named his only son in honor of this man. Had my client been accused of being a follower of that man instead of this one (as he pointed toward Jesus), I’d gladly hand him over to the Bailiff. But that is not the case.”

Tears began to stream down my face as I realized that the accusation raised by Jesus was that I was His follower, and I found it difficult to catch my breath as I understood that my confession was the only viable evidence that he could present. A wave of nausea roiled in me as my lawyer continued addressing the jury.

“The prosecution has submitted this signed confession, and while I don’t dispute that my client did sign this document, I submit that by his own admission it was under duress. He was simply afraid that if he didn’t he’d be sent to hell forever. In my esteemed colleague’s own words, His followers know His voice and you can tell who they are by the fruit of their lives. So even if you apply the prosecution’s own criteria, you must acquit my client on the charge of being a ‘Follower of Christ’.”

My head dropped into my hands as heavy sobs bubbled out of me. I wanted to deny what he was saying, but I knew that he was right. I had no rebuttal. I wept bitter tears, and shook with fear. And, in my head, I heard the voice of the Jury Foreman echoing, “We the jury, find the defendant ‘Not Guilty’ of the charge of being a ‘Follower of Jesus Christ’.” I suddenly felt as though I was falling into a bottomless pit, and that the air was moving by so fast that I couldn’t pull it into my lungs. In the deepest part of my soul I cried out, “God help me!” and instantly everything became still.

I remained completely motionless for what seemed like a very long time. I was afraid to move. Afraid that this wasn’t really a dream, and that I might somehow set this whole thing back in motion. Paralyzed by my fear, I felt as though I could remain there indefinitely. But out of the blue I felt something moving along my back, and I began to hear the faint sounds of a voice. My ears reached for the sound, and it seemed to grow more distinct. The voice seemed very familiar, and it was calling my name. Suddenly, I realized that it was Karen’s voice, and that it was her hand rubbing my back.

“Richard, are you OK? Service is over honey, it’s time to go.”

I cracked open my eyes, and saw that I was still lying face down on the floor of the sanctuary. I carefully pulled my arms up, and tried to push myself into a sitting position. I was dazed, covered in sweat, and my whole body ached. The service had apparently just ended as most of the congregation seemed to be milling about in conversation. Karen looked very concerned, and kept asking if I was alright. But all I could do was nod incoherently. I was just thankful that this whole thing had just been a bad dream, and that it was really over. Karen seemed to want to get me on my feet, but I wasn’t sure she was strong enough to do it by herself. Just then, a man named, Marcus Freeman, stepped over to help her. A lot of people claimed that he was some sort of prophet, but I wasn’t sure that I believed in all of that stuff. Nevertheless, he seemed like a nice enough guy, and I appreciated his help. As they helped me up I tried to stand on my own, but the pain in my one foot shot all the way up my leg, and my knee gave way as they guided me into a chair. Another wave of panic began to rise in me as I realized where that pain had come from, and I could feel my arms trembling against my sides. In that moment, Marcus crouched down beside me, and said, “The Lord told me to tell you that the chair won’t remain empty forever.” He went on to say, “I don’t really know what that means, but the Lord said that you would.” All I could do was nod in agreement.

“Then Jesus said to His disciples, ‘If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me’. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will find it.” Matthew 16: 24-25

1. Heard it Through the Grapevine (Marvin Gaye) This Motown classic was first recorded by Smokey Robinson & the Miracles and was a smash hit for Gladys Knight & the Pips, before Marvin Gaye’s version was ever released. Soon after that, Creedence Clearwater Revival’s (CCR) eleven minute take on the song (from the album “Cosmos Factory”) also gained significant national attention. Despite all of these popular renditions, it is Gaye’s recording that stands out as the quintessential version of this soulful classic.

2. Black Magic Woman (Santana) Many fans of Fleetwood Mac’s “Rumours” era material may not be aware of the bands 1960’s blues band beginnings; but in 1968 group leader Peter Green penned a minor UK hit called “Black Magic Woman”. Two years later, legendary guitarist Carlos Santana (& future Journey vocalist Gregg Rolie) recast the song with a scintillating Latin flavor. It went on to become one of the most successful recordings of Santana’s long and illustrious career.

3. Summertime Blues (The Who) Written and originally recorded by rockabilly artist Eddie Cochran back in the late 1950’s, this song became a concert staple for the Who in the mid 1960’s. Though Cochran’s record achieved a higher chart position, it was the Who’s numerous live recordings that cemented the song’s status as a rock & roll standard.

4. You’re No Good (Linda Ronstadt) Though this had been a Top 5 R&B hit for Betty Everett in 1963 and a Top 5 UK hit for The Swinging Blue Jeans in 1964, it wasn’t until 1974 that Linda Ronstadt recorded what is generally regarded as the definitive version of the song. Combining Ronstadt’s signature vocals, with the haunting accompaniment of the talented Andrew Gold, turned out to be the perfect recipe for a pop music gem.

5. Blueberry Hill (Fats Domino) This song was originally recorded in the 1940’s by the likes of Gene Autry, the Glenn Miller Orchestra and Louie Armstrong. Though it had been a significant hit for both Miller and Armstrong, it was Fats Domino’s 1956 recording that branded the song as a classic. It went on to become the biggest hit of his highly successful career, selling over 5 million copies.

6. Because the Night (Patti Smith) Because of the odd way this record came together, it could be argued that it doesn’t really qualify as a remake; but the original version of the song was written and recorded by Bruce Springsteen, for the “Darkness on the Edge of Town” album. When he decided not to include it on that album, his producer (Jimmy Iovine) shared the tape with Patti Smith, who reworked it for her album “Easter”. Springsteen was impressed enough with Smith’s changes that he subsequently gave her a co-writer credit when he released a live version of the song in 1986.

7. You’ve Got a Friend (James Taylor) Carole King wrote and recorded this song as part of her phenomenally successful “Tapestry” album. At the same time, James Taylor was working with many of the same musicians in an adjacent studio. Upon hearing King’s recording, he decided to include a version on his new album as well. Though the albums were released almost simultaneously, it was Taylor’s version that was first issued as a single. Not only did it reach #1, it went on to win Grammy’s for both Taylor (vocal performance) and King (songwriter). Within the following year, the song had been remade by the likes of Barbara Streisand, Dusty Springfield, Michael Jackson and Aretha Franklin.

8. All Along the Watchtower (Jimi Hendrix) First written and performed by Bob Dylan, Hendrix put his unique stamp on the song, making it his own. It was not unlike what The Bryds had done (a couple of years before) with Dylan’s, “Mr. Tambourine Man”. While Jimi’s guitar playing was legendary, this was perhaps the most fully realized recording (i.e. writing, singing, playing and production) of his short and spectacular career.

9. Blinded by the Light (Manfred Mann’s Earth Band) In its original form, first released as part of the 1973 Bruce Springsteen album “Greetings from Asbury Park N.J.”, this song had a somewhat laidback, acoustic sound. But Mann’s 1976 radical reworking of the arrangement (from the album “The Roaring Silence”) gave it the driving electric feel that eventually landed it at #1 on the pop charts. A few years later, Mann’s Earth Band enjoyed some significant airplay with their remake of yet another early Springsteen tune, “For You”.

10. Respect (Aretha Franklin) This pop music classic was written and originally recorded by R&B legend Otis Redding, back in 1965. Though his version was a Top 5 hit on the Soul charts, it was a young Aretha Franklin (with her sisters singing backup) who recorded what many consider to be one of the greatest singles of all time. Not only did her version hit #1 on the Pop charts, it won two Grammys and was eventually named one of the “Songs of the Century” by the Recording Industry of America.

Pride is the bride of insecurity.  Blindness, presumption and complacency are the children they bear.

See also

Arrogance is not the byproduct of overconfidence, it is the facade we build around our deepest insecurities.

As a white, middle aged man it is tempting to say nothing about many of the controversies that have swirled around in recent months. Unfortunately, some of those issues have hit close enough to home that I’ve needed to interpret and explain them to my kids. In the midst of these discussions, there have been aspects of the current culture that I simply couldn’t make sense of, which is what ultimately compelled me to say something here. Let me preface my remarks with the disclaimer that I am not a racist. I realize that is a fairly worthless declaration, as few people would be willing to admit such a thing to themselves or to anyone else. Nonetheless, I am confident that it is true. I believe that every human being was made in the image of God and, therefore, reveals something unique about who He is. I believe that every life is precious and that every person is worthy of dignity and respect. Because my father was in the military, I was blessed to grow up in a more integrated culture than many people of my generation and to travel to other countries at a young age. This fostered a deep appreciation for the diversity of peoples and cultures that exist beyond my own. I have always believed that the “melting pot” aspect of American society has been one of its greatest strengths. But, despite all that, I am still a Caucasian man, of European decent and, as such, it seems pretty easy to lump me in with all the slave traders and plantation owners who have come before. Of course, in so doing, one would really be no different than a neighborhood watchman, who decides to follow a young man simply because he’s black and wearing a hoodie.

I remember watching my young son experience this phenomenon some years ago. He was about nine years old and we were driving in the car with his best friend, who happened to be black. This was in the season before the 2008 election, and his friend asked him who he was going to vote for. I smiled at the idea of nine year olds having a political discussion and thought about how innocent they were. But, my amusement quickly dissolved when his friend angrily accused him of being a racist for saying that he would vote for John McCain. This was especially shocking to me because these boys had been best friends for years; they’d slept over at each other’s houses and gone to same church since birth. But, in an instant, all of that history was erased because of a dissenting opinion on who was the best candidate. Little did I know that this would be a precursor to many adult discussions that would soon follow, and that I, too, would be accused of the very same thing, by people who should have known me better. Never mind that I’d never voted for any white candidate with the ideology or inexperience that candidate Obama brought to the table, the presumption was that my real issue had to be with the color of his skin. Once again, I risk that accusation by calling into question the way some of these issues are being handled today.

It seems to me that we’ve changed our definition of what constitutes racism and that, along the way, it has become essentially unacceptable to insinuate that a person of color could be a racist. A good example of this occurred during the Trayvon Martin case, where it seemed imperative for the media to portray George Zimmerman as a Caucasian man. Of course, when pictures of Mr. Zimmerman were published, journalists had to concede that he was also of Hispanic descent; but they steadfastly maintained that, for all intents and purposes, he should be considered a white man. I could find no good reason for this charade, other than the idea that a person of ethnic descent couldn’t possibly be motivated by issues of race. In truth, George Zimmerman is as much Hispanic as our president is black, but that doesn’t mean that he was somehow incapable of the racial profiling he was accused of. No race of people has ever completely defeated the very human tendency to distrust those who are different than they are, and, in some cases, to hate them for it. The idea that only white-skinned people battle this issue is the very essence of racism.

In the latest national incident regarding race, a white player for the NFL’s Philadelphia Eagles was caught on tape using the “N” word. To be sure, there is no good justification for what this man did. He has rightfully been shamed and disciplined for his foolish and insensitive behavior. While many of his teammates accepted his apology and seemed ready to move past this unfortunate incident, others have claimed to be so offended that they cannot continue to be in the same organization with him. At this point, it is unclear whether he will remain a part of this team or any other. As I’ve watched these events unfold, I can’t help but wonder at the hypocrisy of it all. Without a doubt this man has heard black players on his team use this term on an almost daily basis in the locker room. Every facet of the Hip Hop culture (e.g. movies, music, comedy…) continues to popularize, promote, and even romanticize this word. Thanks to rappers from Ice-T to Jay-Z, this is how young black kids are taught to refer to themselves and to each other. And after hearing this word all around him for years, this man is now facing the potential loss of his career because it came from his lips. Again, my intent is not to defend Riley Cooper’s actions; he was wrong, and there should be consequences for that. But is it the word that has so offended his teammates or is it the color of the man who said it? Why is that word worth millions when Kanye West shouts it from a stage or raps it on a CD; yet costs millions when we find that it’s passed across Paula Deen’s lips (privately) sometime in the past?

Some might suggest that it isn’t the word itself, but the intent of the person using it, and that would seem to be a valid point. But, if that’s the case, shouldn’t this football player’s three year history with the team outweigh his foolish words in a moment of drunkenness? I’ve heard no one claim that he has any record of behavior that supports the idea that he is a racist. If this were just the latest in a long line of incidents, then, by all means, show him the door. But, if the sole piece of evidence is a twenty-second cell phone video, the (career) death penalty seems a little severe. After all, Dr. King’s dream wasn’t simply equality for people of color; it was that we would reach a point where a man’s skin color wouldn’t matter more than the content of his character. Is Riley Cooper really a racist or is he a foolish man, who in a weak moment used a racist term? I don’t pretend to know the answer, but I would suggest that either one of those is a possibility and that the answer ought to make a difference in how this incident is ultimately resolved.

I personally hate the “N” word and am thankful that most of my black neighbors and friends don’t use it around me. I know the disgusting origins of this term, and it’s mind boggling to me that anyone who knows that history would tolerate its use. I don’t blame anyone for being offended by it, but if we really hate this word why won’t we let it die? There are other racial slurs that I heard as a kid, which have long since disappeared from the vernacular. If you used one of those words around my kids today they’d have no idea what you were talking about. But, even though they’ve never heard me utter the “N” word, they know exactly what it means, and it wasn’t introduced to them by a bunch of rednecks. If we can agree that this word needs to become extinct then there must be an outcry from within the black community against its many prominent and influential members, who continue to champion and profit from the use of this vulgar term. On the other hand, if the problem isn’t so much with the word, but with the race of the person using it, then I would suggest that our problems are much more profound and harder to fix. Either way, I pray that God helps us to find a way to live together in peace.

Patterns

As human beings we are creatures of habit.  It normally begins with a pattern of thought, which often evokes a specific pattern of emotion, which generally results in a certain pattern of behavior.  In and of itself, this isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but even a relatively healthy pattern can sour over time.  Just as we have a natural tendency to adopt these patterns, we also seem inclined to get stuck inside of them.  Unwittingly they begin to shape our concept of reality and of how we fit within it.  For too many of us, the pattern of our lives repeats itself over and over again.  Given enough time, we can easily begin to derive a sense of security (and maybe even identity) from our pattern; and if we’re not careful, we can quickly become a slave to it.

 

Patterns tend to breed rituals, and rituals tend to spawn religion, which is what causes us to rage against anyone or anything that might suggest we need to alter our pattern.  I remember working in a bar years ago, watching people cry in their beer about how terrible their lives were, only to have them curse the bartender who dared propose that maybe they should make a change.  I’ve heard it said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting it to turn out differently.  Based on that measure, there would seem to be a good many of us battling this affliction.

 

Assuming that all of that is true, it should then come as little surprise that “repentance” is a significant tenet of the Christian life.  While many still associate that word with the idea of being sorry or regretting their actions, it actually refers to a change of mind or a change of direction (i.e. a change of pattern).  But more than that, I don’t believe that God would simply have us trade our old bad sinful pattern for a shiny new sanctified one.  I sense that the life He’s authored for us is meant to be filled with growth and spontaneity and wonder; none of which happens when you consistently march in circles (even when those steps are taken within the walls of the temple).  Indeed, the security and familiarity that accompanies repetition would seem to be the antithesis of faith.

 

To my mind, one of the great flaws of religion across the ages has been its propensity to create a pattern and then to spend all of its resources trying to defend and preserve it from change.  I believe that one of the reasons the Lord sent His Holy Spirit to dwell within us was to free us from the bondage that comes with being trapped within a rigid pattern.

 

While I’m not suggesting that there shouldn’t be a certain consistency within the life of a true believer (which could rightfully be described as a pattern), I am saying that if we are not diligent, adherence to our pattern can take precedence over the dynamic, real time relationship that the Lord intended for us to have with Him.  When that happens, it not only impacts the believer, but everyone that the Lord means to touch through them.

 

As I have endeavored to walk with the Lord over the years, I have found that He consistently challenges the presuppositions that are so often used to prop up my pattern.  It’s not always that what I have supposed is necessarily wrong, but at best it is incomplete.  Ultimately, I need to guard my heart against the complacency that so naturally accompanies a pattern.

 

In other words, am I really listening for His voice or do I believe that I know Him so well that I already know what He’d say?  I sense that this is part of what Jesus was saying when He admonished us to come as little children (Matt. 18:3).  Don’t come as an accomplished veteran, who is filled with his own ideas & experiences.  Come as a child, who genuinely relies on his Father for guidance.  Even for the seasoned follower, that is a pattern worth adopting.

1. You get what you pay for. While this statement is most often used in the context of cheaply made goods, it is much less true on the other end of the spectrum. Too often the only difference between highly priced items and the rest is an extra coating of gloss, a trendy nameplate and/or a better advertising campaign. Frequently, we fall for the marketing ploy that spending more somehow makes it (and us) more valuable.
2. That any child is an “accident”. The Bible says that before we were in our mother’s womb, God knew us (Jeremiah 1:5) and that all of our days were written in His book, before one of them came to pass (Psalm 139:16). This tells me that every child is first conceived in the mind of God, before either parent donates their DNA. Just because a parent may not have anticipated their conception doesn’t mean that they weren’t “planned”.
3. That the idea of being “sexy” is harmless. Western society has raised sexuality to a ridiculous level of prominence within the collective consciousness; integrating its elements into just about every aspect of popular culture. Over the years, the term “sexy” has become trivialized to imply ideas like playful or flirty, but in truth it is simply an invitation to consider people in a sexual way. While viewing each other in that light causes all sorts of problems for mature adults, it is especially troubling when you consider how it impacts our children. If we intentionally present our kids in manner that is meant to be enticing (e.g. Jon Benet Ramsey), should we really be shocked when a predator chooses to act on that provocation?
4. That the idea of being “spoiled” is cute. Much like the term “sexy”, the connotation of the word “spoiled” seems to have changed in recent years. Once thought to be something to be avoided, it now seems to be a badge of honor for many (think Kardashian). It is commonplace to hear grandparents brag about “spoiling” their grandkids or to see little girls wear t-shirts boasting of their “spoiled” status. To be sure, this is a phenomenon that is lost on me. Spoiled is what happens to food that’s left out for too long. If you wouldn’t dream of eating something moldy from your refrigerator, why would you set out to “spoil” someone you cared about?
5. The concept of “Mr. or Mrs. Right”. While there are undeniably people who seem destined for each other, the myth of finding Mr. or Mrs. Right is that you can then have a relationship that doesn’t require any real effort. Regardless of how compatible two people may be, a healthy relationship always involves give and take. Just as in a garden, you must start with good seed, weeds occasionally have to be pulled, infestations need to be treated and sometimes things need to be watered by hand.
6. That older people forget what it’s like to be young. The upcoming generations tend to judge the previous generations as staid and set in their ways; often interpreting their maturation as some sort of an indictment on their zest for life. But experience consistently reveals the impetuousness and foolishness of youthful infatuations. With age, one comes to find value in different things and taking unwarranted risks no longer seems like a prudent approach. While some might regard this as an unfortunate side effect of aging, others might rightfully refer to it as wisdom.
7. That there is no such thing as a “moral victory”. In this era of win at all costs, it has become popular to claim that there is no such thing as a “moral victory”; but for many human beings, that is the only kind of victory that they will ever experience. Like teaching a baby to walk, moral victories constitute the first small steps toward consistent success. People who don’t believe in such things often burn themselves (& others) out, trying to run before they’ve developed the ability to stand.
8. That new love is somehow better than old love. We live in a society that seems affixed on the idea of trading in and up, on an almost constant basis (e.g. cellphones, computers, cars, houses…); and that basic philosophy carries into our relationships as well. Most of our cultural allusions toward love seem centered on initial attraction and the titillation of something new; but that is ultimately the shallow end of the relationship pool. It isn’t until you’ve experienced a love that lasts for years that you come to understand the depth and profound fulfillment that accompanies it. This same aesthetic applies to friendships as well (i.e. I wouldn’t trade a few old friends for 500 “friends” on Facebook).
9. The idea that fair and equal is the same thing. As the father of four, I am very aware of the unique qualities of each of my children. In raising them, I’ve not found any one thing that works well with all of them. Each one thinks differently, learns differently and responds to different stimulus. As such, I try to tailor my approach to the specific individual I’m dealing with and I strive to be fair with all of them. Unfortunately, they often perceive that they’ve been treated unfairly because I haven’t dealt with them in the exact same manner as one of their siblings. I suspect that God has the same issue with His kids.
10. “Christian” Leaders who don’t resemble Jesus. The scripture tells us that true disciples have been “predestined” to be conformed to the image of Christ (Rom. 8:29) and that the intensity of this transformation should be “ever-increasing” (2 Cor. 3:18). While all of us fall short of the glory of God, it remains baffling to me that someone can claim to have walked with/represented Jesus for twenty, or thirty, or forty years and yet barely evoke His character. Generally, such ministers are revered more for their giftedness, personality and resume. Ultimately, there is a world of difference between “following” Jesus and doing things in His name.

Bury Me at Sea

At the edge of the dunes
I sense the distant thundering of the tides upon the shore
And as I plod across the scorching sand
I catch my first glimpse of your vastness
My pulse quickens with anticipation

When I reach the cool rim of the shoreline
Your mist reaches up and caresses my face
And as the grains of earth seem to evaporate beneath my feet
I feel myself crossing a threshold
And my soul cries out

Bury me at sea
Pull me into your pounding heart
And swallow me in your majesty

Bury me at sea
Crown me with your foamy crests
And dissolve me in your brine

Bury me at sea
Clutch me in your powerful arms
And carry me to your depths

Bury me at sea
Where the winds of this world cannot be felt
And in the realm of the unseen

Bury me at sea
So the ones I leave behind can visit
And remember that I’m with You

When I first got married, at the ripe old age of 19 yrs. old, I was still too much of a child to seriously consider having children of my own. Throughout my early twenties, as I listened to my peers speak of their parenting struggles, I naively wondered why handling a few small children should be such a big deal. Undoubtedly, my heavenly Father must have chuckled at the understanding of what my future held.

 

In my early thirties, my first marriage crumbled and I was grateful that at least there were no little ones to get snagged in the wreckage. A couple of years later, as a new life emerged for me, I was blessed to become a step-father and little by little the eyes of my understanding began to open. Less than a year after that came a baby boy; and less than a year after that came twins (a boy and a girl). Going 0 to 4 children in less than 24 months is something like going 0 to 60 mph in 2.4 seconds. Needless to say, the years that have followed have been a crash course in the joys and challenges of parenting.

 

Early on, it’s tempting to believe that a colicky baby, who doesn’t sleep through the night, represents a huge ordeal. But as the years pass the climb gets significantly steeper. As a child’s capacity to act independently develops and their world expands, both the possibilities and complexities compound exponentially. Though each stage of life presents its own unique set of hurdles, there is perhaps no greater ache for a parent than to watch their grown child fall headlong into a trap that they’ve been warned about since childhood, or that the parent unwittingly set them up for.

 

The pop cultural landscape is littered with countless resources for parents who are diligently seeking guidance, and while many of them do possess some degree of merit, none could rightfully be considered definitive. Each child is their own puzzle and there is no “one size fits all” approach for raising them.

 

Our three youngest children weren’t even a year apart, with two of them being twins. Additionally, they were home schooled until the 3rd/4th grade, which means that their “shared life experience” was almost identical through their “formative” years. Based on popular thinking, this consistent and stable environment should have created striking similarities in the way these kids function on a day to day basis, but nothing could be further from the truth.

 

I have found that each one thinks differently, learns differently, is inspired differently, expresses themselves differently, fears different things, has different strengths… What works well with one, is often useless with another. I have yet to find the piece of parenting advice (other than “pray without ceasing”) that can blindly be applied, and hope to be effective with every child.

 

As I’ve gotten older, I’ve come to understand that there truly isn’t anything new under the sun and that the struggles of today have all been encountered by previous generations. In looking to the scripture for answers, an amazingly consistent message rings out from the book of Proverbs, which is that discipline needs to be a consistent part of wise parenting. Chapter 13, verse 24 says that “He who spares the rod hates his son, but he who loves him is careful to discipline him”. Chapter 22, verse 15 says, “Folly is bound up in the heart of a child, but the rod of discipline will drive it far from him”. Chapter 23, verses 13 & 14 say, “Do not withhold discipline from a child” and that punishing him will, “save his soul from death”. Finally, chapter 29, verse 15 says, “The rod of correction imparts wisdom, but a child left to himself disgraces his mother”.

 

Certainly, these passages sound harsh in light of our delicate, westernized, politicized sensibilities, but their truth is hard to deny. All one needs to do is to observe any person who was raised without the benefit of boundaries, consequences and discipline to understand the essentialness of these elements. The book of Hebrews expands on this topic in chapter 12, as it explains that discipline is a means that a father uses to teach a son. It also acknowledges that going through that process isn’t pleasant, but that it is ultimately for the son’s benefit.

 

If one simply focuses on those passages, a picture of the stereotypical, rigid, religious, authoritarian parenting approach can easily emerge. But a more comprehensive reading of scripture reveals a very different and far more challenging aesthetic. Throughout the New Testament, the Apostle Paul reminds us that unless love remains at the center of our motivation, our actions become of no eternal value. He also charges us with demonstrating Christ’s character in all situations, most especially before our wives and children.

 

Interestingly, in both the book of Ephesians (6:4) and Colossians (3:21), he warns that we should not provoke (i.e. embitter, exasperate) our children to wrath (i.e. anger, frustration). I don’t believe he’s saying that we should never make them angry, because as the Hebrews passage acknowledges, no one likes to be chastened.

 

I believe the key word in these passages is “provoke”. And I would submit that he is challenging us to discern between those instances when we are genuinely trying to train our kids and when we’re just taking our frustrations out on them; or when we’re simply acting out of our own woundedness; or maybe even when we’re intentionally trying to hurt them like they hurt us. I believe that they recognize the difference, and that we as parents need to as well.

 

Finding the balance of things is a daily battle for any parent. We want to convey God’s unconditional love to our children, but we also need to help them to understand consequences. We want to provide for them, but we also need to allow them to encounter enough resistance to grow strong and stand on their own two feet. We want to let them know that they can count on us, but not make them reliant on us in the process.

 

We need to develop the ability to relate to them on their level without forfeiting the authority (& responsibility) that God has given us as parents. We cannot live in fear of their disapproval, as that will keep us from ever preparing them to make their own way in the world. We need to raise them with the understanding that the season of our influence is limited and that God never intended for them to remain as children.

 

If I’ve made good parenting sound like a daunting task, that is purely intentional. It is the best and hardest job you could ever have. I believe the only way to be a truly effective parent is to tap into the wisdom and guidance of the Father of us all. The scripture says that apart from Him, we can do nothing. That is especially true of parenting.

On an almost daily basis someone seems to get snared by their own e-mail, blog, comment, post, tweet or text; and it occurred to me that “you have a right to remain silent” and that if you choose to forego that right, “anything you say can and will be used against you” in the court of public opinion. Given that fact, I suppose I ought to exercise that privilege and say no more.

It is the smoke a person blows up their own tail-pipe that will most likely cause them to choke.